Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Still little evidence sex differences in spatial navigation are evolutionary adaptations.
Hults, Connor M; Francis, Richard C; Clint, Edward K; Smith, Winter; Sober, Elliott R; Garland, Theodore; Rhodes, Justin S.
Affiliation
  • Hults CM; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, 603 E. Daniel St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
  • Francis RC; Richardcfrancis.com.
  • Clint EK; Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Falls, OR, USA.
  • Smith W; Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Falls, OR, USA.
  • Sober ER; Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Garland T; Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
  • Rhodes JS; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, 603 E. Daniel St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
R Soc Open Sci ; 11(1): 231532, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38234440
ABSTRACT
A putative male advantage in wayfinding ability is the most widely documented sex difference in human cognition and has also been observed in other animals. The common interpretation, the sex-specific adaptation hypothesis, posits that this male advantage evolved as an adaptive response to sex differences in home range size. A previous study a decade ago tested this hypothesis by comparing sex differences in home range size and spatial ability among 11 species and found no relationship. However, the study was limited by the small sample size, the lack of species with a larger female home range and the lack of non-Western human data. The present study represents an update that addresses all of these limitations, including data from 10 more species and from human subsistence cultures. Consistent with the previous result, we found little evidence that sex differences in spatial navigation and home range size are related. We conclude that sex differences in spatial ability are more likely due to experiential factors and/or unselected biological side effects, rather than functional outcomes of natural selection.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: R Soc Open Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: R Soc Open Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article