Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benefits of Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage in Liver Transplant: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Feng, Guo-Ying; Feng, Xu; Tao, Jie; Ao, Yu-Pei; Wu, Xin-Hua; Qi, Shi-Guai; He, Ze-Bo; Shi, Zheng-Rong.
Affiliation
  • Feng GY; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Feng X; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Tao J; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Ao YP; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Wu XH; Infection and Liver Disease Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Qi SG; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • He ZB; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Shi ZR; Department of General Surgery, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 14(3): 101337, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38298754
ABSTRACT

Background:

The magnitude of potential benefits that hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) may provide for liver transplantation (LT) patients compared to static cold storage (SCS) remains uncertain. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect that HOPE can offer LT recipients relative to SCS by synthesizing available evidence.

Methods:

A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database up to 1 June, 2023. The included studies were pooled for meta-analysis to synthesize their findings. Subgroup analysis was performed to investigate potential differences between HOPE and SCS for specific subgroups.

Results:

A total of 11 studies comprising 1765 patients were included. Compared with SCS, HOPE was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.26-0.50), as well as a noteworthy decrease in graft loss rate within one year (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.97) and a lower occurrence of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher complications (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.89). Subgroup analysis revealed that HOPE significantly reduced the one-year mortality rate, any biliary complications incidence, and acute rejection of transplanted liver rate in patients who received organs from donation after cardiac death (DCD).

Conclusions:

HOPE has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the incidence of EAD after LT and shows some potential in diminishing postoperative complications such as biliary complications and acute rejection. This ultimately leads to improved patient prognosis, particularly among those receiving DCD grafts.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article