Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improved outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in systolic heart failure: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database.
Yokoshiki, Hisashi; Shimizu, Akihiko; Mitsuhashi, Takeshi; Ishibashi, Kohei; Kabutoya, Tomoyuki; Yoshiga, Yasuhiro; Kondo, Yusuke; Abe, Haruhiko; Shimizu, Wataru.
Affiliation
  • Yokoshiki H; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Sapporo City General Hospital Sapporo Japan.
  • Shimizu A; UBE Kohsan Central Hospital Ube Japan.
  • Mitsuhashi T; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Hoshi General Hospital Koriyama Japan.
  • Ishibashi K; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan.
  • Kabutoya T; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Shimotsuke Japan.
  • Yoshiga Y; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Clinical Science Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine Ube Japan.
  • Kondo Y; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.
  • Abe H; Department of Heart Rhythm Management University of Occupational and Environmental Health Kitakyushu Japan.
  • Shimizu W; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Nippon Medical School Bunkyo-ku Japan.
J Arrhythm ; 40(1): 30-37, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38333398
ABSTRACT

Background:

Temporal change in outcomes of heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) is unknown.

Methods:

We assess outcomes and underlying heart diseases of patients receiving CRT-D with analyzing database of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry (JCDTR) at the implantation year 2011-2015 and New JCDTR at the implantation year 2018-2021.

Results:

Proportion of nonischemic heart diseases was about 70% in both the groups (JCDTR 69%; New JCDTR 72%). Cardiac sarcoidosis increased with the rate of 5% in the JCDTR to 9% in the New JCDTR group. During an average follow-up of 21 months, death from any cause occurred in 167 of 906 patients in the JCDTR group (18%) and 79 of 611 patients in the New JCDTR group (13%) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] in the New JCDTR group, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.94; p = .017). The superiority was mainly driven by reduction in the risk of noncardiac death. With regard to appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, there was a significant reduction in the New JCDTR group versus the JCDTR group (aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.98; p = .032 for appropriate ICD therapy; aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.24; 95% CI 0.12-0.50; p < .0001 for inappropriate ICD therapy).

Conclusions:

All-cause mortality was reduced in CRT-D patients implanted during 2018-2021 compared to those during 2011-2015, with a significant reduction in noncardiac death.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Arrhythm Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Arrhythm Year: 2024 Document type: Article