Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inter-Reader Consistency and Exclusionary Findings During Radiographic Screening for Phase 3 Trials of Tanezumab in Patients With Osteoarthritis.
Guermazi, Ali; Roemer, Frank W; Kompel, Andrew J; Diaz, Luis E; Crema, Michel D; Brown, Mark T; Hickman, Anne; Pixton, Glenn C; Viktrup, Lars; Fountaine, Robert J; Burr, Aimee; Sherlock, Sarah P; West, Christine R.
Affiliation
  • Guermazi A; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Roemer FW; Veteran Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kompel AJ; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Diaz LE; Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg & Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Crema MD; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Brown MT; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hickman A; Veteran Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Pixton GC; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Viktrup L; Institute of Sports Imaging, Department of Sports Medicine, French National Institute of Sports, Paris, France.
  • Fountaine RJ; Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
  • Burr A; Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
  • Sherlock SP; Pfizer Inc, Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
  • West CR; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Osteoarthr Imaging ; 2(3-4)2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343426
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Describe the radiograph-based screening program and frequencies of ineligibility in 3 large, international, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies of subcutaneous tanezumab in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).

Design:

Standardized bilateral shoulder, hip, and knee screening radiographs were obtained by trained imaging technologists and centrally read by 1 of 5 musculoskeletal radiology experts trained using a program-specific imaging atlas. Inter-reader consistency was tracked with test cases blindly inserted into the reader queue. Readers attended quarterly calibration meetings. Protocol-specified radiographic exclusion criteria included rapidly progressive OA (RPOA) or risk factors for RPOA (including severe malalignment of the knee, subchondral insufficiency fracture, atrophic OA, and osteonecrosis). Patients reporting disproportionate pain to radiographic evidence of OA in the hip or knee (without other pathology) were ineligible under a nonradiographic exclusion criterion.

Results:

At >480 international sites, 23,079 patients entered screening and 13,797 were radiographically assessed. Across 6 sets of quarterly testing, pairwise central reader agreement on radiographic eligibility was 72-87% (kappa 0.41-0.71) and on radiographic OA grading 77-84% (kappa 0.68-0.75). Among the 5,773/13,797 (41.8%) patients who met exclusionary criteria, 27% had disproportionate pain to radiographic findings (~10% of knee/hip radiographs). RPOA or risk factors for RPOA were each identified in <5% of patients (usually 1 joint) and <3% of knee/hip/shoulders.

Conclusions:

The phase 3 tanezumab screening program demonstrated the utility of radiographs to screen patients entering NGF inhibitor trials. A high degree of reader concordance was achieved. RPOA and risk factors for RPOA were not commonly observed. NCT02697773, NCT02709486, NCT02528188.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Language: En Journal: Osteoarthr Imaging Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Language: En Journal: Osteoarthr Imaging Year: 2022 Document type: Article