Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comprehensive examination of temporal-seasonal variations of PM1.0 and PM2.5 in taiwan before and during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Room, Shahzada Amani; Chiu, Yi Chen; Pan, Shih Yu; Chen, Yu-Cheng; Hsiao, Ta-Chih; Chou, Charles C-K; Hussain, Majid; Chi, Kai Hsien.
Affiliation
  • Room SA; Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
  • Chiu YC; Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
  • Pan SY; Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
  • Chen YC; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, 35 Keyan Road, Zhunan Town, Miaoli, Taiwan.
  • Hsiao TC; Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chou CC; Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
  • Hussain M; Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Haripur, 22620, Hattar Road, Haripur City, KP, Pakistan.
  • Chi KH; Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan. khchi2@ym.edu.tw.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 31(21): 31511-31523, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632201
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 has been a significant global concern due to its contagious nature. In May 2021, Taiwan experienced a severe outbreak, leading the government to enforce strict Pandemic Alert Level 3 restrictions in order to curtail its spread. Although previous studies in Taiwan have examined the effects of these measures on air quality, further research is required to compare different time periods and assess the health implications of reducing particulate matter during the Level 3 lockdown. Herein, we analyzed the mass concentrations, chemical compositions, seasonal variations, sources, and potential health risks of PM1.0 and PM2.5 in Central Taiwan before and during the Level 3 lockdown. As a result, coal-fired boilers (47%) and traffic emissions (53%) were identified as the predominant sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in PM1.0, while in PM2.5, the dominant sources of PAHs were coal-fired boilers (28%), traffic emissions (50%), and iron and steel sinter plants (22.1%). Before the pandemic, a greater value of 20.9 ± 6.92 µg/m3 was observed for PM2.5, which decreased to 15.3 ± 2.51 µg/m3 during the pandemic due to a reduction in industrial and anthropogenic emissions. Additionally, prior to the pandemic, PM1.0 had a contribution rate of 79% to PM2.5, which changed to 89% during the pandemic. Similarly, BaPeq values in PM2.5 exhibited a comparable trend, with PM1.0 contributing 86% and 65% respectively. In both periods, the OC/EC ratios for PM1.0 and PM2.5 were above 2, due to secondary organic compounds. The incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) of PAHs in PM2.5 decreased by 4.03 × 10-5 during the pandemic, with PM1.0 contributing 73% due to reduced anthropogenic activities.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Seasons / Environmental Monitoring / Air Pollutants / Air Pollution / Particulate Matter / COVID-19 Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Seasons / Environmental Monitoring / Air Pollutants / Air Pollution / Particulate Matter / COVID-19 Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Year: 2024 Document type: Article