Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mapping and functional characterization of structural variation in 1060 pig genomes.
Yang, Liu; Yin, Hongwei; Bai, Lijing; Yao, Wenye; Tao, Tan; Zhao, Qianyi; Gao, Yahui; Teng, Jinyan; Xu, Zhiting; Lin, Qing; Diao, Shuqi; Pan, Zhangyuan; Guan, Dailu; Li, Bingjie; Zhou, Huaijun; Zhou, Zhongyin; Zhao, Fuping; Wang, Qishan; Pan, Yuchun; Zhang, Zhe; Li, Kui; Fang, Lingzhao; Liu, George E.
Affiliation
  • Yang L; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • Yin H; Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
  • Bai L; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • Yao W; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • Tao T; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhao Q; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • Gao Y; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • Teng J; Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
  • Xu Z; State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Lin Q; State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Diao S; State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Pan Z; State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Guan D; Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Li B; Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Zhou H; Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
  • Zhou Z; Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Zhao F; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Wang Q; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction (Poultry) of Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Pan Y; Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
  • Zhang Z; Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
  • Li K; State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Fang L; Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. likui@caas.cn.
  • Liu GE; Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. lingzhao.fang@qgg.au.dk.
Genome Biol ; 25(1): 116, 2024 05 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715020
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Structural variations (SVs) have significant impacts on complex phenotypes by rearranging large amounts of DNA sequence.

RESULTS:

We present a comprehensive SV catalog based on the whole-genome sequence of 1060 pigs (Sus scrofa) representing 101 breeds, covering 9.6% of the pig genome. This catalog includes 42,487 deletions, 37,913 mobile element insertions, 3308 duplications, 1664 inversions, and 45,184 break ends. Estimates of breed ancestry and hybridization using genotyped SVs align well with those from single nucleotide polymorphisms. Geographically stratified deletions are observed, along with known duplications of the KIT gene, responsible for white coat color in European pigs. Additionally, we identify a recent SINE element insertion in MYO5A transcripts of European pigs, potentially influencing alternative splicing patterns and coat color alterations. Furthermore, a Yorkshire-specific copy number gain within ABCG2 is found, impacting chromatin interactions and gene expression across multiple tissues over a stretch of genomic region of ~200 kb. Preliminary investigations into SV's impact on gene expression and traits using the Pig Genotype-Tissue Expression (PigGTEx) data reveal SV associations with regulatory variants and gene-trait pairs. For instance, a 51-bp deletion is linked to the lead eQTL of the lipid metabolism regulating gene FADS3, whose expression in embryo may affect loin muscle area, as revealed by our transcriptome-wide association studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

This SV catalog serves as a valuable resource for studying diversity, evolutionary history, and functional shaping of the pig genome by processes like domestication, trait-based breeding, and adaptive evolution.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genome / Genomic Structural Variation Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Genome Biol Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genome / Genomic Structural Variation Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Genome Biol Year: 2024 Document type: Article