Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Multiple Orthopaedic Injuries.
McCormick, William F; Yeager, Matthew T; Morris, Cade; Johnston, Thomas R; Schick, Samuel; He, Jun Kit; Spitler, Clay A; Mitchell, Phillip M; Johnson, Joey P.
Affiliation
  • McCormick WF; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (McCormick, Yeager, Johnston, Schick, He, Spitler, and Johnson) and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN (Morris and Mitchell).
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833727
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) plays a vital role in providing life support for patients with reversible cardiac or respiratory failure. Given the high rate of complications and difficulties associated with caring for ECMO patients, the goal of this study was to compare outcomes of orthopaedic surgery in polytrauma patients who received ECMO with similar patients who have not. This will help elucidate the timing and type of fixation that should be considered in patients on ECMO.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort was collected from the electronic medical record of two level I trauma centers over an 8-year period (2015 to 2022) using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were matched with a similar counterpart not requiring ECMO based on sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, injury severity score, and fracture characteristics. Outcomes measured included length of stay, number of revisions, time to definitive fixation, infection, amputation, revision surgery to promote bone healing, implant failure, bleeding requiring return to the operating room, and mortality.

RESULTS:

Thirty-two patients comprised our ECMO cohort with a patient-matched control group. The ECMO cohort had an increased length of stay (40 versus 17.5 days, P = 0.001), number of amputations (7 versus 0, P = 0.011), and mortality rate (19% versus 0%, P = 0.024). When comparing patients placed on ECMO before definitive fixation and after definitive fixation, the group placed on ECMO before definitive fixation had significantly longer time to definitive fixation than the group placed on ECMO after fixation (14 versus 2.0 days, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

ECMO is a lifesaving measure for trauma patients with cardiopulmonary issues but can complicate fracture care. Although it is not associated with an increase in revision surgery rates, ECMO was associated with prolonged hospital stay and delays in definitive fracture surgery when initiated before definitive fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article