Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery score after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma have prognostic value?
Leech, N; Krige, J E J; Sobnach, S; Kloppers, J C; Bernon, M M; Burmeister, S; Jonas, E G.
Affiliation
  • Leech N; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town Health, South Africa.
  • Krige JEJ; Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.
  • Sobnach S; Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.
  • Kloppers JC; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town Health, South Africa.
  • Bernon MM; Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.
  • Burmeister S; Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.
  • Jonas EG; Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.
S Afr J Surg ; 62(2): 33-38, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838117
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The value of the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery (TOPS) score, a composite measure of surgical performance for quality assurance, was evaluated in a South African tertiary hospital cohort of pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) performed for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (AAV).

METHODS:

A review of all patients undergoing a PD for AAV at a single centre between January 1999 and December 2023 was performed. Demographic, operative, pathological and postoperative variables were recorded. Ten clinical and histological variables were used to construct a TOPS score. These included an R0 resection, no postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no bile leak, no post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, no delayed gastric emptying, no major postoperative complications (< Gr 3 Clavien-Dindo), no readmission to ICU, length of stay ≤ 10 days, no 30-day readmission or intervention and no 30-day mortality. A textbook outcome (TO) was defined as the fulfilment of all 10 variables. In patients in whom TO was not achieved, the reasons for failure were identified. In addition, the number of patients who had major complications and died were categorised as failure to rescue (FTR).

RESULTS:

A positive TOPS score was achieved in 27 of 79 (34.2%) patients undergoing a PD. Overall five-year survival after PD was 33.9%. TOPS conferred a significant 1-year survival benefit, 88.9% vs 66.7% (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.08-15.67, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between TOPS and non-TOPS patients, 40.0% vs 32.4% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.48-3.99, p = 0.54). A POPF occurred in 31.6% patients, resulting in a significantly longer hospital admission, 17 vs 10 days (95% CI 2.66-11.34, p = 0.0019). Twenty-one (26.6%) patients developed a major complication, five of whom died (FTR = 6.3%).

CONCLUSION:

This study confirmed the value of TOPS as a useful measurement to assess hospital quality metrics and short-term survival after PD for AAV. One quarter of patients developed a major complication with a 6.3% FTR.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ampulla of Vater / Adenocarcinoma / Pancreaticoduodenectomy / Common Bile Duct Neoplasms Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: En Journal: S Afr J Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ampulla of Vater / Adenocarcinoma / Pancreaticoduodenectomy / Common Bile Duct Neoplasms Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: En Journal: S Afr J Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article