Viability assessed with the most probable number dilution culture method after chemical treatment of ballast water reveals the presence of false negatives from an approved vital stain method.

ABSTRACT

The present study compares the CMFDA/FDA + motility- and the Most Probable Number (MPN) Dilution Culture + Motility methods for testing the viability of ≥10-<50 µm organisms in chlorine treated ballast water. The results of both methods were within the regulatory compliance criterion <10 organisms/mL, but the MPN-method revealed that growth-outs did occur. While the CMFDA/FDA method showed <0.5 organisms/mL, the MPN-method gave approx. 6 organisms/mL. This demonstrated that false negatives, i.e. living but not stained organisms, may occur when using the CMFDA/FDA-method for compliance testing of chemical treated ballast water. Organisms surviving the treatment were primarily the dinoflagellate Scrippsiella sp. and various coccoid chlorophytes present in a brackish- and freshwater test, respectively. It is suggested that their resilience to the chemical treatment is the ability to transform into a temporary cyst (Scrippsiella sp.) or the presence of a chemical resistant cell wall (certain chlorophytes).