Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the value and knowledge gains from an online tick identification and tick-borne disease management course for the Southeastern United States.
Lippi, Catherine A; Gaff, Holly D; White, Alexis L; Ryan, Sadie J.
Affiliation
  • Lippi CA; Quantitative Disease Ecology and Conservation (QDEC) Lab Group, Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Gaff HD; Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • White AL; Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
  • Ryan SJ; Vector-borne Disease Eco-epidemiology and Control Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1793, 2024 Jul 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970066
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tick-borne diseases are a growing public health threat in the United States. Despite the prevalence and rising burden of tick-borne diseases, there are major gaps in baseline knowledge and surveillance efforts for tick vectors, even among vector control districts and public health agencies. To address this issue, an online tick training course (OTTC) was developed through the Southeastern Center of Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases (SECOEVBD) to provide a comprehensive knowledge base on ticks, tick-borne diseases, and their management.

METHODS:

The OTTC consisted of training modules covering topics including tick biology, tick identification, tick-borne diseases, and public health, personal tick safety, and tick surveillance. The course was largely promoted to vector control specialists and public health employees throughout the Southeastern US. We collected assessment and survey data on participants to gauge learning outcomes, perceptions of the utility of knowledge gained, and barriers and facilitators to applying the knowledge in the field.

RESULTS:

The OTTC was successful in increasing participants' baseline knowledge across all course subject areas, with the average score on assessment increasing from 62.6% (pre-course) to 86.7% (post-course). More than half of participants (63.6%) indicated that they would definitely use information from the course in their work. Barriers to using information identified in the delayed assessment included lack of opportunities to apply skills (18.5%) and the need for additional specialized training beyond what the OTTC currently offers (18.5%), while the main facilitator (70.4%) for applying knowledge was having opportunities at work, such as an existing tick surveillance program.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, this OTTC demonstrated capacity to improve knowledge in a necessary and underserved public health field, and more than half of participants use or plan to use the information in their work. The geographic reach of this online resource was much larger than simply for the Southeastern region for which it was designed, suggesting a much broader need for this resource. Understanding the utility and penetrance of training programs such as these is important for refining materials and assessing optimal targets for training.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Tick-Borne Diseases Limits: Adult / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: BMC Public Health / BMC public health (Online) Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Tick-Borne Diseases Limits: Adult / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: BMC Public Health / BMC public health (Online) Year: 2024 Document type: Article