Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AI for detection, classification and prediction of loss of alignment of distal radius fractures; a systematic review.
Oude Nijhuis, Koen D; Dankelman, Lente H M; Wiersma, Jort P; Barvelink, Britt; IJpma, Frank F A; Verhofstad, Michael H J; Doornberg, Job N; Colaris, Joost W; Wijffels, Mathieu M E.
Affiliation
  • Oude Nijhuis KD; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groningen, Groningen University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands. k.d.oude.nijhuis@umcg.nl.
  • Dankelman LHM; Department of Surgery, Groningen, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands. k.d.oude.nijhuis@umcg.nl.
  • Wiersma JP; Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands. l.dankelman@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Barvelink B; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hand and Arm Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, The Netherlands. l.dankelman@erasmusmc.nl.
  • IJpma FFA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groningen, Groningen University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Verhofstad MHJ; University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Doornberg JN; Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Colaris JW; Department of Surgery, Groningen, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Wijffels MME; Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981869
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Early and accurate assessment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) is crucial for optimal prognosis. Identifying fractures likely to lose threshold alignment (instability) in a cast is vital for treatment decisions, yet prediction tools' accuracy and reliability remain challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), can evaluate radiographic images with high performance. This systematic review aims to summarize studies utilizing CNNs to detect, classify, or predict loss of threshold alignment of DRFs.

METHODS:

A literature search was performed according to the PRISMA. Studies were eligible when the use of AI for the detection, classification, or prediction of loss of threshold alignment was analyzed. Quality assessment was done with a modified version of the methodologic index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).

RESULTS:

Of the 576 identified studies, 15 were included. On fracture detection, studies reported sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80 to 99% and 73-100%, respectively; the AUC ranged from 0.87 to 0.99; the accuracy varied from 82 to 99%. The accuracy of fracture classification ranged from 60 to 81% and the AUC from 0.59 to 0.84. No studies focused on predicting loss of thresholds alignement of DRFs.

CONCLUSION:

AI models for DRF detection show promising performance, indicating the potential of algorithms to assist clinicians in the assessment of radiographs. In addition, AI models showed similar performance compared to clinicians. No algorithms for predicting the loss of threshold alignment were identified in our literature search despite the clinical relevance of such algorithms.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article