Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Chinese Patients.
Yu, Weihua; Chen, Jionghuang; Fan, Luqi; Yan, Chenli; Zhu, Linghua.
Affiliation
  • Yu W; Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Chen J; Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Fan L; Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Yan C; School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics Business, Beijing, China.
  • Zhu L; Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. 3198020@zju.edu.cn.
Obes Surg ; 34(8): 2828-2834, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981958
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most popular bariatric surgery procedure in China. However, its cost-effectiveness in Chinese patients is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVES:

This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of LSG vs no surgery in Chinese patients with severe and complex obesity, taking into account both healthcare expenses and the potential improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, encompassing 135 Chinese patients who underwent LSG between January 3, 2022 and December 29, 2022, at a major bariatric center. The study evaluated the cost-effectiveness from a healthcare service perspective, employing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The analyses compared LSG with the alternative of not undergoing surgery over a 1-year period, using actual data, and extended to a lifetime horizon by projecting costs and utilities at an annual discount rate of 3.0%. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to explore cost-effectiveness variations across different sex, age and BMI categories, and diabetes status, employing a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). To ensure the reliability of the findings, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were executed.

RESULTS:

The results indicated that 1-year post-LSG, patients achieved an average total weight loss (TWL) of (32.7 ± 7.3)% and an excess weight loss (EWL) of (97.8 ± 23.1)%. The ICER for LSG compared to no surgery over a lifetime was $4,327/QALY, significantly below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold for Chinese patients with severe and complex obesity. From a lifetime perspective, LSG proved to be cost-effective for all sex and age groups, across all BMI categories, and for both patients with and without diabetes. Notably, it was more cost-effective for younger patients, patients with higher BMI, and patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS:

LSG is a highly cost-effective intervention for managing obesity in Chinese patients, delivering substantial benefits in terms of HRQoL improvement at a low cost. Its cost-effectiveness is particularly pronounced among younger individuals, those with higher BMI, and patients with diabetes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Obesity, Morbid / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Laparoscopy / Quality-Adjusted Life Years / Gastrectomy Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Obes Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Obesity, Morbid / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Laparoscopy / Quality-Adjusted Life Years / Gastrectomy Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Obes Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article