Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Collaborative Care Cost-Sharing and Referral Rates in Colorado.
Cliff, Betsy Q; Xie, Tiffany H; Laiteerapong, Neda.
Affiliation
  • Cliff BQ; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, S. Maryland Ave Chicago, IL.
  • Xie TH; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, S. Maryland Ave Chicago, IL.
  • Laiteerapong N; Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Med Care ; 62(9): 624-627, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986112
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Collaborative care integrates mental health treatment into primary care and has been shown effective. Yet even in states where its use has been encouraged, take-up remains low and there are potential financial barriers to care.

OBJECTIVE:

Describe patient out-of-pocket costs and variations in referral patterns for collaborative care in Colorado. RESEARCH

DESIGN:

Retrospective observational study using administrative medical claims data to identify outpatient visits with collaborative care. For individuals with ≥1 visit, we measure spending and visits at the month level. Among physicians with billings for collaborative care, we measure prevalence of eligible patients with collaborative care utilization.

SUBJECTS:

Patients with Medicare, Medicare Advantage, or commercial health insurance in Colorado, 2018-2019.

OUTCOMES:

Out-of-pocket costs (enrollee payments to clinicians), total spending (insurer+enrollee payments to clinicians), percent of patients billed collaborative care.

RESULTS:

Median total spending (insurer+patient cost) was $48.32 (IQR $41-$53). Median out-of-pocket cost per month in collaborative care was $8.35 per visit (IQR $0-$10). Patients with commercial insurance paid the most per month (median $15); patients with Medicare Advantage paid the least (median $0). Among clinicians billing for collaborative care (n=193), a mean of 12 percent of eligible patients utilized collaborative care; family practice and advanced practice clinicians' patients utilized it most often.

CONCLUSIONS:

Collaborative care remains underused with fewer than 1 in 6 potentially eligible patients receiving care in this setting. Out-of-pocket costs varied, though were generally low; uncertainty about costs may contribute to low uptake.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Health Care / Referral and Consultation / Cost Sharing / Health Expenditures Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Med Care Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Health Care / Referral and Consultation / Cost Sharing / Health Expenditures Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Med Care Year: 2024 Document type: Article