Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single-fly genome assemblies fill major phylogenomic gaps across the Drosophilidae Tree of Life.
Kim, Bernard Y; Gellert, Hannah R; Church, Samuel H; Suvorov, Anton; Anderson, Sean S; Barmina, Olga; Beskid, Sofia G; Comeault, Aaron A; Crown, K Nicole; Diamond, Sarah E; Dorus, Steve; Fujichika, Takako; Hemker, James A; Hrcek, Jan; Kankare, Maaria; Katoh, Toru; Magnacca, Karl N; Martin, Ryan A; Matsunaga, Teruyuki; Medeiros, Matthew J; Miller, Danny E; Pitnick, Scott; Schiffer, Michele; Simoni, Sara; Steenwinkel, Tessa E; Syed, Zeeshan A; Takahashi, Aya; Wei, Kevin H-C; Yokoyama, Tsuya; Eisen, Michael B; Kopp, Artyom; Matute, Daniel; Obbard, Darren J; O'Grady, Patrick M; Price, Donald K; Toda, Masanori J; Werner, Thomas; Petrov, Dmitri A.
Affiliation
  • Kim BY; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
  • Gellert HR; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
  • Church SH; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut United States of America.
  • Suvorov A; Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
  • Anderson SS; Department of Biology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • Barmina O; Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
  • Beskid SG; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
  • Comeault AA; School of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
  • Crown KN; Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Diamond SE; Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Dorus S; Center for Reproductive Evolution, Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
  • Fujichika T; Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hemker JA; Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
  • Hrcek J; Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic.
  • Kankare M; Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Katoh T; Department of Biological Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Magnacca KN; Hawaii Invertebrate Program, Division of Forestry & Wildlife, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
  • Martin RA; Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Matsunaga T; Department of Complexity Science and Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Medeiros MJ; Pacific Biosciences Research Center, University of Hawai'i, Manoa, Hawaii, United States of America.
  • Miller DE; Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
  • Pitnick S; Center for Reproductive Evolution, Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
  • Schiffer M; Daintree Rainforest Observatory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
  • Simoni S; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
  • Steenwinkel TE; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
  • Syed ZA; Center for Reproductive Evolution, Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
  • Takahashi A; Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Wei KH; Department of Zoology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Yokoyama T; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
  • Eisen MB; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
  • Kopp A; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
  • Matute D; Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
  • Obbard DJ; Department of Biology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • O'Grady PM; Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Price DK; Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
  • Toda MJ; School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.
  • Werner T; Hokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Petrov DA; Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, United States of America.
PLoS Biol ; 22(7): e3002697, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39024225
ABSTRACT
Long-read sequencing is driving rapid progress in genome assembly across all major groups of life, including species of the family Drosophilidae, a longtime model system for genetics, genomics, and evolution. We previously developed a cost-effective hybrid Oxford Nanopore (ONT) long-read and Illumina short-read sequencing approach and used it to assemble 101 drosophilid genomes from laboratory cultures, greatly increasing the number of genome assemblies for this taxonomic group. The next major challenge is to address the laboratory culture bias in taxon sampling by sequencing genomes of species that cannot easily be reared in the lab. Here, we build upon our previous methods to perform amplification-free ONT sequencing of single wild flies obtained either directly from the field or from ethanol-preserved specimens in museum collections, greatly improving the representation of lesser studied drosophilid taxa in whole-genome data. Using Illumina Novaseq X Plus and ONT P2 sequencers with R10.4.1 chemistry, we set a new benchmark for inexpensive hybrid genome assembly at US $150 per genome while assembling genomes from as little as 35 ng of genomic DNA from a single fly. We present 183 new genome assemblies for 179 species as a resource for drosophilid systematics, phylogenetics, and comparative genomics. Of these genomes, 62 are from pooled lab strains and 121 from single adult flies. Despite the sample limitations of working with small insects, most single-fly diploid assemblies are comparable in contiguity (>1 Mb contig N50), completeness (>98% complete dipteran BUSCOs), and accuracy (>QV40 genome-wide with ONT R10.4.1) to assemblies from inbred lines. We present a well-resolved multi-locus phylogeny for 360 drosophilid and 4 outgroup species encompassing all publicly available (as of August 2023) genomes for this group. Finally, we present a Progressive Cactus whole-genome, reference-free alignment built from a subset of 298 suitably high-quality drosophilid genomes. The new assemblies and alignment, along with updated laboratory protocols and computational pipelines, are released as an open resource and as a tool for studying evolution at the scale of an entire insect family.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Phylogeny / Drosophilidae / Genomics / Genome, Insect Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: PLoS Biol Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Phylogeny / Drosophilidae / Genomics / Genome, Insect Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: PLoS Biol Year: 2024 Document type: Article