Endovascular management of basilar artery aneurysms: a consecutive series of 124 patients.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is currently no established criterion for determining when interventional treatment is necessary and what strategy is appropriate for basilar artery (BA) aneurysms. Through this study, we aimed to propose an algorithm that can effectively determine the optimal endovascular treatment (EVT) option for BA aneurysms. METHODS: We enrolled patients with BA aneurysms from June 2016 to December 2022 and performed procedures based on the algorithm. The analysis included demographic, clinical, and aneurysmal characteristics, procedural details, complications, angiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 124 patients (mean age 55.0 years) with a BA aneurysm who underwent EVT. Of these, 21 aneurysms were treated in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The majority of aneurysms were located at the basilar apex (74), followed by the basilar trunk (30) and vertebrobasilar junction (20). Coiling was used in 18.5% of cases, while stent-assisted coiling embolization was chosen for 58.9%. Overlapping stents were used in 12.9%, flow diverter (FD) implantation in 3.2%, Y/T stent techniques in 4.8%, and stent adjunctive coiling with unilateral vertebral artery (VA) occlusion in only 1.6%. Procedure-related complications occurred in 15 patients (12.1%). Patients had a modified Rankin Scale(mRS) score of 0.74±1.62; 98 (86.7%) had good prognosis with mRS scores ranging from 0 to 2 at the last follow-up. DSA was performed on 105 (84.7%) patients revealing that 101 (81.5%) achieved complete or near-complete occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: The endovascular treatment criteria for BA aneurysms depended on the multi-characteristics was safe and effective. However, further evidence is needed from large cohort studies.