Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors associated with difficult intravenous access in the paediatric emergency department: A prospective cohort study.
Dunstan, Lucy; Sweeny, Amy L; Lam, Clayton; Goucher, Bianca; Watkins, Stuart; George, Shane; Snelling, Peter J.
Affiliation
  • Dunstan L; Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Sweeny AL; Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Lam C; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Goucher B; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Watkins S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • George S; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Snelling PJ; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas ; 2024 Aug 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099445
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Although it is the most performed invasive procedure, peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion in children can be difficult. The primary objective of the study was to identify the factors associated with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in the paediatric ED, including patient, proceduralist and situational factors.

METHODS:

This was a single-centre prospective observational cohort study conducted over 28 consecutive days. Research assistants observed PIVC insertion attempts for children under 16 years of age and recorded data for variables relating to the patient, proceduralist and event. Univariate logistic regression modelling was performed to identify factors associated with DIVA, defined as unsuccessful PIVC insertion on the first attempt.

RESULTS:

A total of 134 participants were recruited; 66 were male (49%) with a median age of 5.7 years. Fifty-two (39%) were classified as having DIVA. There was a total of 207 PIVC insertion attempts with two or more attempts needed for 48 children (36%). Patient factors associated with DIVA included age of 3 years or less and limited vein options. Proceduralist factors included gestalt of 50% or less chance of success, use of a larger gauge (smaller bore) PIVC and less PIVC insertion experience. Situational factors included a combative child, higher pain score and loud ambient noise.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study identified multiple patient, proceduralist and situational factors that were associated with DIVA in the paediatric ED. Future studies should explore the development and implementation of a package to address DIVA in children, with the patient-centred goals of reducing pain and improving success.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Emerg Med Australas Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Emerg Med Australas Year: 2024 Document type: Article