Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Short-term complication rates of open reduction and plate fixation and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a propensity score matched analysis.
Whitaker, Sarah; Cole, Sarah; O'Neill, Conor; Satalich, James; Schmidt, R Cole; Vanderbeck, Jennifer.
Affiliation
  • Whitaker S; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA. whitakerst@vcu.edu.
  • Cole S; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
  • O'Neill C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Satalich J; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.
  • Schmidt RC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.
  • Vanderbeck J; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(8): 3361-3368, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39123065
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This is a retrospective cohort study designed to compare short-term postoperative complication rates between closed humeral shaft fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus intramedullary nailing (IMN), as well as secondary independent risk factors for adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried using CPT codes to identify patients that underwent an open reduction and plate fixation or intramedullary nailing procedure for a closed humeral shaft fracture from 2010 to 2021. Cohorts were matched using propensity scores to account for demographic differences and rates of complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS:

From the database, a total of 4,222 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria, with 3,326 and 896 undergoing ORIF and IMN respectively. After propensity score matching, 866 of the nearest-neighbor matches were included in each cohort for a total of 1,732 patients in the final analysis. The rate of any adverse event (AAE) was significantly higher in the ORIF cohort (16.3%) than the IMN cohort (12.1%, p = 0.01). The ORIF group had higher rates of postoperative transfusion (p = 0.002), return to OR (p = 0.005), and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis, ASA class 4, increasing age, increasing operative time, and history of bleeding disorder were found to increase the risk of AAE in both ORIF and IMN patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

While prior studies have claimed higher complication rates in IMN patients, this study found a significantly higher short-term risk of AAE in ORIF patients when compared in matched cohorts. However, individual 30-day complication rates do not differ significantly between procedures, and both have been shown to be safe and effective tools in the management of humeral shaft fractures.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Bone Plates / Propensity Score / Open Fracture Reduction / Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary / Humeral Fractures Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Bone Plates / Propensity Score / Open Fracture Reduction / Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary / Humeral Fractures Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article