Variability of radiological and clinical features in cases with usual interstitial pneumonia without honeycombing.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) cases without honeycombing (possible UIP) included various CT features and was often difficult to diagnose. PURPOSE: This study aimed to classify the cases with possible UIP on CT features using cluster analysis and evaluate the features of subsets of participants and the correlation of prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 85 patients with possible UIP in the 2011 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guideline with radiological diagnosis. All cases underwent surgical biopsies and were diagnosed by multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) from the nationwide registry in Japan. The readers evaluated pulmonary opacity, nodules, cysts, and predominant distribution which were reclassified by IPF guidelines in 2018. Additionally, cases were classified into four groups by cluster analysis based on CT findings. The differences in survival among IPF classification and the clusters were evaluated. RESULTS: Cases were diagnosed as IPF (n = 55), NSIP (n = 4), unclassifiable (n = 23), and others (n = 3) by MDD. Cluster analysis revealed 4 clusters by CT features (n = 47, 16, 19 and 3, respectively). Cluster 1 had fewer lesions overall. Cluster 2 have many pure ground-glass opacities and ground-glass opacities with reticulation. Cluster 3 had many reticular opacities and nodules with few lower predominant distributions. Cluster 4 was characterized by peribronchovascular consolidation.The mean survival time of cluster 1 (4518 days) was significantly better than cluster 2, 3, and 4 (1843, 2196, and 1814 days, respectively) (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, UIP without honeycombing included various CT patterns and MDD diagnoses. Significangly differences in prognosis were observed among clusters classified by CT findings.