Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Osteosarcopenia and trabecular bone score in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Pechmann, Luciana Muniz; Petterle, Ricardo R; Moreira, Carolina A; Borba, Victoria Z. C.
Afiliação
  • Pechmann, Luciana Muniz; Universidade Federal do Paraná. Hospital de Clínicas. Centro de Diabetes Curitiba. Curitiba. BR
  • Petterle, Ricardo R; Universidade Federal do Paraná. Faculdade de Medicina. Setor de Ciências da Saúde. Curitiba. BR
  • Moreira, Carolina A; Universidade Federal do Paraná. Hospital de Clínicas. Divisão de Endocrinologia. Curitiba. BR
  • Borba, Victoria Z. C; Universidade Federal do Paraná. Hospital de Clínicas. Divisão de Endocrinologia. Curitiba. BR
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 65(6): 801-810, Nov.-Dec. 2021. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS | ID: biblio-1349996
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the prevalence of osteosarcopenia and the association of osteosarcopenia with trabecular bone score (TBS) in a group of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DMG) compared with a paired control group (CG). Materials and

methods:

Cross-sectional study with men and women ≥ 50 years recruited by convenience. Patients in both groups answered questionnaires and underwent evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD), handgrip strength (HGS), and TBS. The T2DMG also underwent a gait speed (GS) test. Sarcopenia was defined as low lean mass plus low HGS or GS according to the Foundation for the National Institute of Health Sarcopenia Project, and osteosarcopenia was deemed present when sarcopenia was associated with osteopenia, osteoporosis, or low-energy trauma fractures.

Results:

The T2DMG (n = 177) and CG (n = 146) had, respectively, mean ages of 65.1 ± 8.2 years and 68.8 ± 11.0 years and 114 (64.4%) and 80 (54.7%) women. T2DMG versus the CG had higher rates of osteosarcopenia (11.9% versus 2.14%, respectively, p = 0.010), sarcopenia (12.9% versus 5.4%, respectively, p < 0.030), and fractures (29.9% versus 18.5%, respectively, p = 0.019), and lower HGS values (24.4 ± 10.3 kg versus 30.9 ± 9.15 kg, respectively, p < 0.001), but comparable BMD values. Mean TBS values were 1.272 ± 0.11 and 1.320 ± 0.12, respectively (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, age, greater waist circumference, fractures, and osteoporosis increased the risk of degraded TBS. Osteosarcopenia was associated with diabetes complications (p = 0.03), calcium and vitamin D supplementation (p = 0.01), and all components of osteosarcopenia diagnosis (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Compared with the CG, the T2DMG had a higher prevalence of osteosarcopenia, sarcopenia, and fractures and lower bone quality assessed by TBS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Sarcopenia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Sarcopenia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article