A case-control comparison of the results of renal transplantation from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The decline in heart-beating brainstem dead organ donors has necessitated the search for other organ sources. In the field of renal transplantation one alternative source currently available, but little used, is that of kidneys from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD). Reticence to use NHBD kidneys is in part due to concerns over the effect that warm ischemic may have subsequent graft function. Presented here are the results of the NHBD renal transplants at the Leicester transplant unit, and compared with matched heart-beating donor transplants as a case control analysis. METHODS: In order to analyze any differences in graft performance between the two organ sources, the confounding effect of other variables known to influence the outcome of renal transplantation was minimized by matching NHBD and HBD transplants for the following criteria donor age and sex, first or re-transplant, anastomosis and cold times, tissue match and PRA sensitisation. Transplant performance was assessed primarily by graft survival, the statistical evaluation of which was by log rank analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: 72 NHBD and 192 HBD transplants were performed over an eight year period. Of the 192 HBD transplants, 105 matched one or more of the NHBD by the criteria outlined above, and thus constituted the control group for comparison. There was no significant difference in overall graft survival between the two groups. The 5 year survival for the NHBD was 73% compared with 65% for HBD kidneys. When death with a functioning graft is treated as censored data, then these figures become 75% and 81% respectively, again without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: NHBD kidneys are a valuable additional source of organs for transplantation, with long-term survival, comparable to transplants from HBD.