Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water versus distilled water.
Kettering, James D; Stephens, Joni A; Muñoz-Viveros, Carlos A; Naylor, W Patrick.
Afiliação
  • Kettering JD; Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology at Loma Linda University Schools of Medicine, USA. jkettering@som.llu.edu
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 3(3): 1-9, 2002 Aug 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12239573
BACKGROUND: The maximum recommended level of microbial contamination of water from dental unit waterlines (DUWL) is 200 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). This article addresses the importance of water selection in achieving that standard. METHODS: Microbial contamination in water samples from 75 new dental units, with a closed-circuit water system, were compared using combinations of tap water and sterile distilled water with and without two chemical disinfectants (bleach and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, Bio2000) over a six-week period. Baseline tap water samples were collected and tested initially. RESULTS: The microbial plate counts of seven tap water specimens (controls) ranged from 4 to 95 CFU/mL. These results were well below both the 500 CFU/mL standard for public drinking water and the 200 CFU/mL goal for dental treatment water. However, when passed through dental units, no significant bacterial reduction was achieved for samples of tap water (Group 1), tap water treated with bleach (Group 2), or tap water treated with Bio2000 (Group 4). Only water samples from dental units using Bio2000 alone (Group 3) or a combination of sterile, distilled water with Bio2000 (Group 5) met or exceeded the 200 CFU/mL standard. CONCLUSIONS: Using tap water alone or tap water with bleach did not improve water quality. However, the American Dental Association (ADA) standard for reduced microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines was met using Bio2000 and distilled water treated with Bio2000. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The ADA standard of 200 CFU/mL was achieved using a closed water system and distilled water treated with Bio2000. Using 100% Bio2000 is also effective, but more costly.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microbiologia da Água / Abastecimento de Água / Clorexidina / Purificação da Água / Controle de Infecções Dentárias / Equipamentos Odontológicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Contemp Dent Pract Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microbiologia da Água / Abastecimento de Água / Clorexidina / Purificação da Água / Controle de Infecções Dentárias / Equipamentos Odontológicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Contemp Dent Pract Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article