Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physician attitudes toward strategies to promote the adoption of medical evidence into clinical practice.
Borenstein, Jeff; Chiou, Chiun-Fang; Henning, James M; Wilson, Alisa; Hohlbauch, Andriana A; Richards, Margaret S; Ofman, Joshua J; Weingarten, Scott R.
Afiliação
  • Borenstein J; Department of Medicine and Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Health System, and Zynx Health Inc, Los Angeles, Calif 90212, USA.
Am J Manag Care ; 9(3): 225-34, 2003 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12643340
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

[corrected] Promoting the adoption of medical evidence into clinical practice has been advocated as one approach to improving healthcare quality and reducing medical errors. Data describing the effectiveness of different strategies to achieve this goal in real-world settings are limited.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the effectiveness of selected interventions on the adoption of medical evidence into clinical practice. STUDY

DESIGN:

A cross-sectional survey of a random sample of physicians selected from the American Medical Association's Physician Master File. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We examined the perceived effectiveness of 7 strategies (represented by 27 individual interventions) and 5 general approaches for promoting the adoption of medical evidence into clinical practice in 1100 practicing physicians. Respondent exposure to interventions was also determined. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors that affected effectiveness ratings. Analysis of variance was used to test the hypothesis of equal mean scores across different comparison groups.

RESULTS:

Of 1,100 surveys mailed, 63 (5.7%) were excluded and 431 were completed (response rate = 41.6%). Mean +/- SD effectiveness scores for the 27 individual interventions on a 5-point Likert scale ranged from 2.0 +/- 0.9 (literature received from insurance companies and managed care organizations) to 4.2 +/- 0.8 (one-on-one communication with respected colleagues). Ranges for the 7 strategies were 2.6 +/- 1.0 (patient-mediated interventions) to 3.6 +/- 0.9 (educational meetings) and for the 5 general approaches were 1.98 +/- 0.9 (administrative interventions) to 3.3 +/- 0.8 (provider education). The hypothesis of equal mean effectiveness scores was rejected for all comparisons (P < .001). Frequency of exposure was the only variable to predict effectiveness (P < .001 for all regression models).

CONCLUSION:

From the perspective of practicing physicians, the frequency of exposure to strategies for promoting the adoption of medical evidence into clinical practice strongly affects their perceived effectiveness.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Fomentar_producao_conhecimento_especifico Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Medicina Baseada em Evidências / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Difusão de Inovações Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Manag Care Ano de publicação: 2003 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Fomentar_producao_conhecimento_especifico Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Medicina Baseada em Evidências / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Difusão de Inovações Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Manag Care Ano de publicação: 2003 Tipo de documento: Article