Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by the general practitioner for patients with neck pain: long-term results from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.
Hoving, Jan L; de Vet, Henrica C W; Koes, Bart W; Mameren, Henk van; Devillé, Walter L J M; van der Windt, Daniëlle A W M; Assendelft, Willem J J; Pool, Jan J M; Scholten, Rob J P M; Korthals-de Bos, Ingeborg B C; Bouter, Lex M.
Afiliação
  • Hoving JL; Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin J Pain ; 22(4): 370-7, 2006 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16691091
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The authors' goals were to compare the effectiveness of manual therapy (MT; mainly spinal mobilization), physical therapy (PT; mainly exercise therapy), and continued care by the general practitioner (GP; analgesics, counseling and education) over a period of 1 year.

METHODS:

One hundred eighty-three patients suffering for at least 2 weeks from nonspecific neck pain were randomized to receive a 6-week treatment strategy of MT once a week, PT twice a week, or GP care once every 2 weeks. The primary outcome measures were perceived recovery, severity of physical dysfunctioning, pain intensity, and functional disability.

RESULTS:

The differences between groups considered over 1 year were statistically significant (repeated measurements analyses P<0.001 to P=0.02) for all outcomes but borderline for the Neck Disability Index (P=0.06). Higher improvement scores were observed for MT for all outcomes, followed by PT and GP care. The success rate, based on perceived recovery after 13 weeks, was 72% for MT, which was significantly higher than the success rate for continued GP care (42%, P=0.001) but not significantly higher compared with PT treatment (59%, P=0.16). The difference between PT and GP approached statistical significance (P=0.06). After 1 year the success rates were 75%, 63%, and 56%, respectively, and no longer significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS:

Short-term results (at 7 weeks) have shown that MT speeded recovery compared with GP care and, to a lesser extent, also compared with PT. In the long-term, GP treatment and PT caught up with MT, and differences between the three treatment groups decreased and lost statistical significance at the 13-week and 52-week follow-up.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos de Família / Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Resultado do Tratamento / Cervicalgia / Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin J Pain Ano de publicação: 2006 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos de Família / Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Resultado do Tratamento / Cervicalgia / Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin J Pain Ano de publicação: 2006 Tipo de documento: Article