Can U.S. GI fellowship programs meet American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training in EUS? A survey of U.S. GI fellowship program directors.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) EUS training and credentialing guidelines exist, but the capability of U.S. GI fellowships to meet these guidelines has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the capability of U.S. GI fellowship programs to meet ASGE guidelines for EUS training in the context of 3-year and advanced GI fellowships. METHODS: U.S. GI fellowship programs were surveyed for the presence or the absence, type, and extent of EUS training. Demographics regarding the programs and the program directors were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Data on the annual total EUS volume and data on EUS performed by 3-year and/or advanced-year fellows were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-one of 142 contactable GI programs responded (64%); 72% of programs performed >200 EUS/y and thus could train >or=1 EUS trainee/y. For 3-year GI fellows, 55% received less than 3 months of training, with 43% not receiving actual "hands-on" EUS experience, and 61% not learning EUS-guided FNA. The median EUS performed by 3-year fellows was 50 (0-350). Programs that offer advanced endoscopy fellowship had a median advanced-trainee EUS volume of 200 procedures (range, 50-1100 procedures). Of advanced fellows, 20% failed to receive "hands-on" training and 52% performed <200 procedures. We observed a significant difference in the median EUS volume performed by 3-year versus advanced-year fellows (P<.001). Program director variables did not correlate with training EUS volumes. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of U.S. GI fellowship programs have established the EUS volume to train at least 1 EUS fellow, per ASGE guidelines; however, most 3-year and many advanced fellows are currently receiving insufficient EUS training.