Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a phantom model.
Krug, Kathrin Barbara; Stützer, Hartmut; Girnus, Ralf; Zähringer, Markus; Gossmann, Axel; Winnekendonk, Guido; Lackner, Klaus.
Afiliação
  • Krug KB; Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstrasse 62, Cologne, NRW 50924, Germany. Barbara.Krug@uk-koeln.de
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 188(2): 399-407, 2007 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17242248
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of our study was to compare the detection and distinguishability of microcalcifications on mammograms obtained with a digital direct flat-panel detector versus an analog system using an anthropomorphic breast phantom. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Studies were performed with a digital mammography system (Selenia) and an analog mammography system (Mammomat 3). Sixty-five transparent films were used as test specimens. Randomly distributed round and heterogeneous silicate particles (diameter, 100-1,400 microm) and an anthropomorphic scatter body were applied to the films. All radiographs were taken at identical settings and exposures. Six radiologists rated the films and monitor-displayed images independently of each other in random order on a standardized electronic questionnaire.

RESULTS:

Interpretations based on monitor reading produced superior results over those based on digital image reading and analog film reading. In 41.1% (95% CI, 38.7-43.5%) of all the monitor readings, 20.2% (18.2-22.2%) of all digital images, and 19.6% (17.6-21.6%) of all analog films, the number of detectable microcalcifications agreed with the gold standard method. The diameter of visible microcalcifications was interpreted correctly in 35.6% (33.2-38.0%) of monitor readings, 19.0% (17.1-21.0%) of digital images, and 21.0% (18.9-23.0%) of analog films; and microcalcification shape was interpreted correctly in 53.8% (51.4-56.3%) of monitor readings, 28.2% (26.0-30.4%) of digital images, and 28.3% (26.0-30.5%) of analog films. Microcalcification number and size were underestimated more frequently than overestimated. Regardless of display medium, accuracy increased proportionately with the diameter of the simulated microcalcifications for all evaluation variables.

CONCLUSION:

Digital flat-panel mammography is superior to the analog screen-film method for the detection and morphologic characterization of microcalcifications larger than 200 microm in diameter when the display medium is a monitor.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecrans Intensificadores para Raios X / Neoplasias da Mama / Apresentação de Dados / Mamografia / Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecrans Intensificadores para Raios X / Neoplasias da Mama / Apresentação de Dados / Mamografia / Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article