Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of official hours versus non-official hours: percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.
Srimahachota, Suphot; Boonyaratavej, Smonporn; Udayachalerm, Wasan; Buddhari, Wacin; Chaipromprasit, Jarkarpun; Suithichaiyakul, Taworn.
Afiliação
  • Srimahachota S; Cardiac center and Division of Cardiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. trcssmc@md2.md.chula.ac.th
J Med Assoc Thai ; 90(1): 45-51, 2007 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17621732
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now a favorable treatment for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, in non-official hours (non-OH), this modality of treatment has a questionable outcome because of the treatment delay. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of PCI during official hours (OH) with non-OH in acute STEMI patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective consecutive registry of PCI in acute ST-elevation MI patients at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from May 1999 to December 2003 were analyzed. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to determine the in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty six consecutive patients (OH-107, non-OH-149) who underwent PCI for acute STEMI were enrolled. Their mean age (61.9 +/- 12.2 vs 60.6 +/- 12.8 y, p = ns), male gender (73.8% vs 73.2%, p = ns), history of diabetes (30.2% vs 33.8%, p = ns), severity of the patients (percent of patients in Killip IV--22.4 vs 21.5, p = ns), ejection fraction (48.7 +/- 15.1 vs 45.9 +/- 14.7, p = ns), cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior PCI (15.0% vs 14.2%, p = ns), anterior MI (55.1% vs 51.0%, p = ns) were similar in both groups. Hypertension was slightly less common (39.6% vs 52.7%, p = 0.04) but smoking was more common (62.6% vs 49.0%, p = 0.03) in OH group. Door to balloon time and decision to balloon time were significantly shorter in the OH group than the non-OH group (67.9 +/- 47 vs 119.6 +/- 83 min, p < 0.001 and 60.8 +/- 35 vs 98.3 min, p < 0.001). However, the total delayed time was not statistically significantly different (402 +/- 316 vs 424 +/- 215, p = 0.55). Angiographic success rate was achieved in 98.1% for the OH group and 94.7% in the non-OH group (p = ns). In-hospital mortality rate was 10.3% and 10.7% respectively. CONCLUSION: The door to balloon time for PCI in acute STEMI patients in the non-OH group was longer than the OH group; however, the total delayed time was not different. The in-hospital mortality rate was similar.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Med Assoc Thai Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Med Assoc Thai Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article