CIN2 is a much less reproducible and less valid diagnosis than CIN3: results from a histological review of population-based cervical samples.
Int J Gynecol Pathol
; 26(4): 441-6, 2007 Oct.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-17885496
ABSTRACT
We wished to compare the relative reproducibility and validity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN3 diagnoses. In a population-based cohort study (1993-2001) of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical neoplasia in Costa Rica, we compared community pathologists' diagnoses with those of the 2 independent reviewers from the United States (total, n = 357). As measures of validity, we correlated primary and review diagnoses with HPV positivity and cytological interpretations. Two review pathologists agreed with 84% and 81%, respectively, of initial diagnoses of CIN3 compared with 13% and 31% of CIN2. The CIN3 diagnoses made by review pathologists were 94% oncogenic HPV positive, compared with 72% of CIN2 diagnoses. Eighty-one percent of CIN3 diagnoses versus 61% of CIN2 were correlated with high-grade cytological interpretations. The CIN3 is a substantially more reproducible diagnosis that can be validated more frequently with HPV tests and cytological interpretations than CIN2.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Displasia do Colo do Útero
/
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adolescent
/
Adult
/
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
País/Região como assunto:
America central
/
Costa rica
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Int J Gynecol Pathol
Ano de publicação:
2007
Tipo de documento:
Article