Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness analysis of PCR for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Scherer, Luciene C; Sperhacke, Rosa D; Ruffino-Netto, Antonio; Rossetti, Maria Lr; Vater, Claudia; Klatser, Paul; Kritski, Afrânio L.
Afiliação
  • Scherer LC; Universidade Luterana do Brasil-ULBRA, Canoas/RS/Brazil. luciene.scherer@hotmail.com
BMC Infect Dis ; 9: 216, 2009 Dec 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20043842
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is one of the most prominent health problems in the world, causing 1.75 million deaths each year. Rapid clinical diagnosis is important in patients who have co-morbidities such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Direct microscopy has low sensitivity and culture takes 3 to 6 weeks 123. Therefore, new tools for TB diagnosis are necessary, especially in health settings with a high prevalence of HIV/TB co-infection. METHODS: In a public reference TB/HIV hospital in Brazil, we compared the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for diagnosis of pulmonary TB: Acid fast bacilli smear microscopy by Ziehl-Neelsen staining (AFB smear) plus culture and AFB smear plus colorimetric test (PCR dot-blot).From May 2003 to May 2004, sputum was collected consecutively from PTB suspects attending the Parthenon Reference Hospital. Sputum samples were examined by AFB smear, culture, and PCR dot-blot. The gold standard was a positive culture combined with the definition of clinical PTB. Cost analysis included health services and patient costs. RESULTS: The AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot require the lowest laboratory investment for equipment (US$ 20,000). The total screening costs are 3.8 times for AFB smear plus culture versus for AFB smear plus PCR dot blot costs (US$ 5,635,760 versus US$ 1,498, 660). Costs per correctly diagnosed case were US$ 50,773 and US$ 13,749 for AFB smear plus culture and AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot, respectively. AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot was more cost-effective than AFB smear plus culture, when the cost of treating all correctly diagnosed cases was considered. The cost of returning patients, which are not treated due to a negative result, to the health service, was higher in AFB smear plus culture than for AFB smear plus PCR dot-blot, US$ 374,778,045 and US$ 110,849,055, respectively. CONCLUSION: AFB smear associated with PCR dot-blot associated has the potential to be a cost-effective tool in the fight against PTB for patients attended in the TB/HIV reference hospital.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose Pulmonar / Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase / Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose Pulmonar / Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase / Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article