Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide compared with placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a 6-week, randomized, controlled Phase IIIb study.
Beier, Jutta; Kirsten, Anne-Marie; Mróz, Robert; Segarra, Rosa; Chuecos, Ferran; Caracta, Cynthia; Gil, Esther Garcia.
Afiliação
  • Beier J; Insaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany. j.beier@insaf-wi.de
COPD ; 10(4): 511-22, 2013 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23819698
BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, Phase IIIb study evaluated the 24-hour bronchodilatory efficacy of aclidinium bromide versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Patients received aclidinium 400 µg twice daily (morning and evening), tiotropium 18 µg once daily (morning), or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second area under the curve for the 24-hour period post-morning dose (FEV1 AUC0-24) at week 6. Secondary and additional endpoints included FEV1 AUC12-24, COPD symptoms (EXAcerbations of chronic pulmonary disease Tool-Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS] total score and additional symptoms questionnaire), and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 414 patients were randomized and treated (FEV1 1.63 L [55.8% predicted]). Compared with placebo, FEV1 AUC0-24 and FEV1 AUC12-24 were significantly increased from baseline with aclidinium (∆ = 150 mL and 160 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) and tiotropium (∆ = 140 mL and 123 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) at week 6. Significant improvements in E-RS total scores over 6 weeks were numerically greater with aclidinium (p < 0.0001) than tiotropium (p < 0.05) versus placebo. Only aclidinium significantly reduced the severity of early-morning cough, wheeze, shortness of breath, and phlegm, and of nighttime symptoms versus placebo (p < 0.05). Adverse-event (AE) incidence (28%) was similar between treatments. Few anticholinergic AEs (<1.5%) or serious AEs (<3%) occurred in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Aclidinium provided significant 24-hour bronchodilation versus placebo from day 1 with comparable efficacy to tiotropium after 6 weeks. Improvements in COPD symptoms were consistently numerically greater with aclidinium versus tiotropium. Aclidinium was generally well tolerated.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derivados da Escopolamina / Tropanos / Broncodilatadores / Antagonistas Muscarínicos / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: COPD Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derivados da Escopolamina / Tropanos / Broncodilatadores / Antagonistas Muscarínicos / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: COPD Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article