Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost effectiveness of adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium in COPD in four Nordic countries.
Nielsen, Rune; Kankaanranta, Hannu; Bjermer, Leif; Lange, Peter; Arnetorp, Sofie; Hedegaard, Morten; Stenling, Anna; Mittmann, Nicole.
Afiliação
  • Nielsen R; Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 65, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, N-5021 Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: rune.nielsen@med.uib.no.
Respir Med ; 107(11): 1709-21, 2013 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23856511
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Assess the cost effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) Turbuhaler(®)+tiotropium (TIO) HandiHaler(®) vs. placebo (PBO)+TIO in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) eligible for inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting ß2-agonists (ICS/LABA).

METHODS:

The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the 12-week, randomised, double-blind CLIMB trial. The study included 659 patients with pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s ≤ 50% and ≥1 exacerbation requiring systemic glucocorticosteroids or antibiotics the preceding year. Patients received BUD/FORM 320/9 µg bid + TIO 18 µg qd or PBO bid + TIO 18 µg qd. Effectiveness was defined as the number of severe exacerbations (hospitalisation/emergency room visit/systemic glucocorticosteroids) avoided. A sub-analysis included antibiotics in the definition of an exacerbation. Resource use from CLIMB was combined with Danish (DKK), Finnish (€), Norwegian (NOK) and Swedish (SEK) unit costs (2010). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for BUD/FORM + TIO vs. PBO + TIO were estimated using descriptive statistics and uncertainty around estimates using bootstrapping. Analyses were conducted from the societal and healthcare perspectives in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.

RESULTS:

From a societal perspective, the ICER was estimated at €174/severe exacerbation avoided in Finland while BUD/FORM + TIO was dominant in the other countries. From the healthcare perspective, ICERs were DKK 1580 (€212), €307 and SEK 1573 (€165) per severe exacerbation avoided for Denmark, Finland and Sweden, respectively, while BUD/FORM + TIO was dominant in Norway. Including antibiotics decreased ICERs by 8-15%. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were overall robust.

CONCLUSION:

BUD/FORM + TIO represents a clinical and economic benefit to health systems and society for the treatment of COPD in the Nordic countries. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00496470).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derivados da Escopolamina / Broncodilatadores / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Budesonida / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Etanolaminas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Respir Med Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derivados da Escopolamina / Broncodilatadores / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Budesonida / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Etanolaminas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Respir Med Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article