Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Semiautomated volumetric measurement on postcontrast MR imaging for analysis of recurrent and residual disease in glioblastoma multiforme.
Chow, D S; Qi, J; Guo, X; Miloushev, V Z; Iwamoto, F M; Bruce, J N; Lassman, A B; Schwartz, L H; Lignelli, A; Zhao, B; Filippi, C G.
Afiliação
  • Chow DS; From the Departments of Radiology (D.S.C., J.Q., X.G., V.Z.M., L.H.S., A.L., B.Z., C.G.F.).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 35(3): 498-503, 2014 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23988756
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

A limitation in postoperative monitoring of patients with glioblastoma is the lack of objective measures to quantify residual and recurrent disease. Automated computer-assisted volumetric analysis of contrast-enhancing tissue represents a potential tool to aid the radiologist in following these patients. In this study, we hypothesize that computer-assisted volumetry will show increased precision and speed over conventional 1D and 2D techniques in assessing residual and/or recurrent tumor. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This retrospective study included patients with native glioblastomas with MR imaging performed at 24-48 hours following resection and 2-4 months postoperatively. 1D and 2D measurements were performed by 2 neuroradiologists with Certificates of Added Qualification. Volumetry was performed by using manual segmentation and computer-assisted volumetry, which combines region-based active contours and a level set approach. Tumor response was assessed by using established 1D, 2D, and volumetric standards. Manual and computer-assisted volumetry segmentation times were compared. Interobserver correlation was determined among 1D, 2D, and volumetric techniques.

RESULTS:

Twenty-nine patients were analyzed. Discrepancy in disease status between 1D and 2D compared with computer-assisted volumetry was 10.3% (3/29) and 17.2% (5/29), respectively. The mean time for segmentation between manual and computer-assisted volumetry techniques was 9.7 minutes and <1 minute, respectively (P < .01). Interobserver correlation was highest for volumetric measurements (0.995; 95% CI, 0.990-0.997) compared with 1D (0.826; 95% CI, 0.695-0.904) and 2D (0.905; 95% CI, 0.828-0.948) measurements.

CONCLUSIONS:

Computer-assisted volumetry provides a reproducible and faster volumetric assessment of enhancing tumor burden, which has implications for monitoring disease progression and quantification of tumor burden in treatment trials.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Glioblastoma / Meios de Contraste / Carga Tumoral / Neuroimagem / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Glioblastoma / Meios de Contraste / Carga Tumoral / Neuroimagem / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article