Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate as augmentation therapy in adults with residual symptoms of major depressive disorder after treatment with escitalopram.
Trivedi, Madhukar H; Cutler, Andrew J; Richards, Cynthia; Lasser, Robert; Geibel, Brooke B; Gao, Joseph; Sambunaris, Angelo; Patkar, Ashwin A.
Afiliação
  • Trivedi MH; Department of Psychiatry, Comprehensive Center for Depression, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9119 madhukar.trivedi@utsouthwestern.edu.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 74(8): 802-9, 2013 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24021497
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for major depressive disorder (MDD) in escitalopram nonremitters.

METHOD:

In this proof-of-concept study (conducted from July 2009-August 2010) with a prespecified critical α = .10, adults with nonpsychotic MDD (DSM-IV-TR criteria) and residual depressive symptoms (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≥ 4) after 8 weeks of open-label escitalopram were randomized to 6 weeks of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (20-50 mg/d) or placebo augmentation. The primary endpoint, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score change in escitalopram nonremitters (MADRS total score > 10) from week 8 (augmentation baseline) to week 14/end of study, was assessed using analysis of covariance, with last observation carried forward.

RESULTS:

For nonremitters (placebo, n = 64; lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, n = 65), the least squares (LS) mean (90% CI) treatment difference for MADRS total score reduction at week 14/end of study (-2.3 [-4.5 to -0.1]; P = .0902) met the prespecified criterion for lisdexamfetamine dimesylate superiority (adjusted effect size, -0.3); the number needed to treat for MADRS remission (MADRS total score ≤ 10) was 6.7. The LS mean treatment difference in remitters was not statistically significant (1.2 [-1.6 to 4.0]; P = .4726). Among randomized participants, 49.4% (42/85) receiving placebo and 60.2% (53/88) receiving lisdexamfetamine dimesylate had ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event, the most frequent with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate being dry mouth and headache (both 11.4%). Mean (SD) vital sign and electrocardiogram changes (placebo vs lisdexamfetamine dimesylate) were 0.5 (8.98) versus 2.3 (9.04) mm Hg (systolic blood pressure), -1.0 (7.19) versus 0.9 (6.61) mm Hg (diastolic blood pressure), -0.4 (7.39) versus 4.8 (8.64) beats per minute (heart rate), and -1.6 (11.23) versus -4.9 (11.84) milliseconds (Fridericia-adjusted QTc).

CONCLUSIONS:

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation reduced depressive symptoms in participants with inadequate escitalopram response. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00905424.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Citalopram / Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração / Transtorno Depressivo Maior / Dextroanfetamina / Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Citalopram / Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração / Transtorno Depressivo Maior / Dextroanfetamina / Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article