Performance of the Japanese glomerular filtration rate equation based on standardized serum cystatin C in potential kidney donors.

BACKGROUND: It was reported that the glomerula filtration rate (GFR) equation based on serum creatinine underestimated the GFR in potential kidney donors. Recently, the Japanese GFR equation based on standardized serum cystatin C was reported. Therefore, we assessed the performance of the equation in potential kidney donors. METHODS: Forty-five potential kidney donors from 2 hospitals were included. GFR was measured (mGFR) using inulin renal clearance. Serum creatinine was measured using the enzymatic method. Serum cystatin C was measured using a nephelometric immunoassay (Siemens) and calibrated to the standardized value traceable to ERM-DA471/IFCC using an equation reported previously. The estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated using the Japanese GFR equation based on serum creatinine (eGFRcreat) and the Japanese GFR equation based on serum cystatin C (eGFRcys). Bias (mGFR - eGFR) and accuracy (P30) of the equations were evaluated. RESULTS: Inulin clearance, eGFRcreat, and eGFRcys were 91.0 ± 18.2, 78.5 ± 18.8, and 93.3 ± 16.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. Bias of eGFRcreat was 12.4 ± 15.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and significantly different from zero, indicating underestimation of GFR. Bias of eGFRcys was -2.3 ± 16.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and was not significantly different from zero, suggesting better performance. But, the precision (standard deviation [SD] of bias) and accuracy (P30: Percentage of participants with eGFR within 30% of mGFR) of eGFRcys were not better compared with eGFRcreat. Accuracies (P30) of eGFRcreat and eGFRcys were 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74-94) and 82% (95% CI, 69-91), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bias of eGFRcys was better compared with eGFRcreat. But, the precision (SD of bias) and accuracy of eGFRcys were not superior compared with eGFRcreat in potential kidney donors.