Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
C vs N: which end of the cyanide anion is a better hydrogen bond acceptor?
Ramabhadran, Raghunath O; Hua, Yuran; Flood, Amar H; Raghavachari, Krishnan.
Afiliação
  • Ramabhadran RO; Department of Chemistry, Indiana University , Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States.
J Phys Chem A ; 118(35): 7418-23, 2014 Sep 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24707902
ABSTRACT
The ability of the C and N ends of the cyanide anion (CN(-)) as acceptors of hydrogen bonds, an experimentally difficult problem, has been computationally examined in this study. Structures obtained in our previous work involving cyanide binding within the cavity of a triazolophane macrocycle (Chem.-Eur. J. 2011, 17, 9123-9129) were used to analyze the problem. Three different approaches involving (a) breakdown of the triazolophane into smaller components, (b) population analyses, and (c) ion-dipole analyses helped demonstrate that the N terminus of cyanide is a slightly better hydrogen bond acceptor than the C terminus even though it is not the site of protonation or covalent bond formation. This outcome reflects a competition between the preference for noncovalent interactions at the nitrogen and covalent bond formation at the carbon.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cianetos / Ânions Idioma: En Revista: J Phys Chem A Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cianetos / Ânions Idioma: En Revista: J Phys Chem A Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article