Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which criteria demand additive stenting during catheter-directed thrombolysis?
Bækgaard, N; Just, S; Foegh, P.
Afiliação
  • Bækgaard N; Vascular Clinic, Gentofte Hospital and Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Baekgaard@dadlnet.dk.
  • Just S; Vascular Clinic, Gentofte Hospital and Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Foegh P; Vascular Clinic, Gentofte Hospital and Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Phlebology ; 29(1 suppl): 112-118, 2014 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24843096
ABSTRACT
Many factors are necessary for obtaining satisfactory results after catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Selections of patients, composition of the thrombolytic fluid, anticoagulation per- and post-procedural, recognition and treatment of persistent obstructive lesions of the iliac veins are the most important contributors. Stenting has been known for 15 to 20 years. The first publication on CDT in 1991 was combined with ballooning the iliac vein, an additive procedure which has been abandoned as an isolated procedure. This chapter will discuss selection, indication, such as an iliac compression syndrome, and outcome of iliac stenting in combination with CDT. The reported frequency of stenting used after CDT is very inconsistent, therefore this will be discussed in details. It is concluded that selection for stenting is of the greatest importance, when CDT is used for iliofemoral DVT, but strict criteria for stenting are not available in the existing literature. The potential value of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is also discussed.
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phlebology Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phlebology Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article