Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Simplified topical anesthesia protocol for ambulatory cataract surgery: safety and patient and surgeon satisfaction]. / Étude de satisfaction et de sécurité d'un protocole d'anesthésie simplifié pour la chirurgie de cataracte sous anesthésie topique.
Batta, B; Fuchs-Buder, T; Tréchot, F; Angioi, K.
Afiliação
  • Batta B; Département d'ophtalmologie, CHU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy cedex, France.
  • Fuchs-Buder T; Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, CHU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy cedex, France.
  • Tréchot F; Département d'ophtalmologie, CHU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy cedex, France.
  • Angioi K; Département d'ophtalmologie, CHU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy cedex, France. Electronic address: k.angioi-duprez@chu-nancy.fr.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 37(7): 548-56, 2014 Sep.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25085227
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of our study was to assess safety and efficacy of cataract surgery (CS) under topical anesthesia alone, i.e. without pre-anesthetic evaluation and without direct presence of an anesthesiologist. To this end we assessed the incidence of patients' preoperative anxiety, perioperative adverse events and patients' and surgeons' satisfaction. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients undergoing CS under topical anesthesia over a one-month period were included. An anesthesiologist and nurse anesthetist were present in the area and could intervene in case of an adverse event. Patients' anxiety was scored using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety & Information Scale (APAIS), and their satisfaction with the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS). Surgeons' satisfaction was scored with a VAS from 0 to 10 (0 surgery not possible & 10 excellent surgical conditions). RESULTS AND

DISCUSSION:

One hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients were included; mean age was 71 (±9.4) years. Mean APAIS I was 6.4/20 (±3.7). Mean APAIS II was 3.1 (±1.8). Mean ISAS score was 5.5/6 (±0.6), indicating high patient satisfaction. Surgeon satisfaction score was 8.9/10 (±1.7). Twenty-three adverse events occurred of which 16 required interventions by the anaesthesiologist or surgeon 5 supplemental local or regional anaesthesia, 6 iv-analgesia, 5 management of hypertension.

CONCLUSION:

These preliminary data suggest that a simplified topical anesthesia protocol for ambulatory CS appears to be feasible and safe, as long as an anesthesia team is present in the area to intervene if needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procaína / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Extração de Catarata / Satisfação do Paciente / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios / Anestésicos Locais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Fr Revista: J Fr Ophtalmol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procaína / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Extração de Catarata / Satisfação do Paciente / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios / Anestésicos Locais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Fr Revista: J Fr Ophtalmol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article