Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of the closed-face cassette at different orientations while measuring total particles.
Cook, David M; Sleeth, Darrah K; Thiese, Matthew S; Larson, Rodney R.
Afiliação
  • Cook DM; a Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 12(3): 199-204, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25337937
ABSTRACT
The current method for sampling aerosols using the 37-mm closed-face cassette (CFC) sampler is based on the orientation of the cassette at ∼45° from horizontal. There is some concern as to whether this method is appropriate and may be underestimating exposures. An alternative orientation at ∼0° (horizontal) has been discussed. This research compared the CFC's orientation at 45° from horizontal to the proposed orientation at horizontal, 0° in a controlled laboratory setting. The particles used in this study were fused alumina oxide in four sizes, approximately 9.5 µm, 12.8 µm, 18 µm, and 44.3 µm in aerodynamic diameter. For each test, one aerosol was dispersed in a wind tunnel operating at 0.2 m/s with samplers mounted in the breathing zone of a rotating mannequin. A sampling event consisted of four pairs of samplers, placed side by side (one pair at 45° and another at 0° cassette orientation), and exposed for a period of 45 minutes. A total of 12 sampling events, 3 sample events per particle size, were conducted with a total of 94 samples collected. Mass concentration measurements were compared to assess the relationship between the sampler orientations of the cassettes. In addition, the relationship between the mass collected on the cassette filter and on the interior walls of the cassette was also assessed. The results indicated that there was no significant difference between the measured concentrations based on the orientation of the CFCs. The amount of mass collected on the interior walls of the cassettes was relatively low (<5%) compared to expected (up to 100%) wall losses for both orientations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tamanho da Partícula / Monitoramento Ambiental / Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar / Material Particulado Idioma: En Revista: J Occup Environ Hyg Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tamanho da Partícula / Monitoramento Ambiental / Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar / Material Particulado Idioma: En Revista: J Occup Environ Hyg Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article