Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Burden of present-on-admission infections and health care-associated infections, by race and ethnicity.
Jeon, Christie Y; Muennig, Peter; Furuya, E Yoko; Cohen, Bevin; Nash, Denis; Larson, Elaine L.
Afiliação
  • Jeon CY; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: christie.jeon@cshs.org.
  • Muennig P; Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
  • Furuya EY; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
  • Cohen B; School of Nursing, City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College Campus, New York, NY.
  • Nash D; CUNY School of Public Health at Hunter College, Hunter College Campus, New York, NY.
  • Larson EL; School of Nursing, City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College Campus, New York, NY.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(12): 1296-302, 2014 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25465260
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the United States incidence of sepsis and pneumonia differ by race, but it is unclear whether this is due to intrinsic factors or health care factors.

METHODS:

We conducted a study of 52,006 patients hospitalized during 2006-2008 at a referral hospital in upper Manhattan. We examined how the prevalence of present-on-admission and health care-associated infection compared between non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites adjusting for sociodemographic factors, admission through the emergency department, and comorbid conditions.

RESULTS:

Non-Hispanic blacks had 1.59-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.96) and 1.55-fold (95% CI, 1.35-1.77) risk of community-acquired bloodstream infection and urinary tract infection compared with non-Hispanic whites. Hispanic patients had 1.31-fold (95% CI, 1.15-1.49) risk of presenting with community-acquired urinary tract infection compared with non-Hispanic whites. Controlling for admission through the emergency department, comorbidity, and neighborhood income attenuated the differences in prevalence of infections.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found that health disparities in present-on-admission infections might be largely explained by potential lack of ambulatory care, socioeconomic factors, and comorbidity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 2_ODS3 / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia / Infecções Urinárias / Infecção Hospitalar / Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas / Sepse Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 2_ODS3 / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia / Infecções Urinárias / Infecção Hospitalar / Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas / Sepse Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article