Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What investigations are needed to optimally monitor for malignancies in SLE?
Tessier-Cloutier, B; Clarke, A E; Pineau, C A; Keeling, S; Bissonauth, A; Ramsey-Goldman, R; Lee, J; Bernatsky, S.
Afiliação
  • Tessier-Cloutier B; McGill University Health Centre, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal, Canada.
  • Clarke AE; University of Calgary, Division of Rheumatology, Calgary, Canada.
  • Pineau CA; Montreal General Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Montreal, Canada.
  • Keeling S; University of Alberta, Division of Rheumatology, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Bissonauth A; University of Alberta, Division of Rheumatology, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Ramsey-Goldman R; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Lee J; McGill University Health Centre, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal, Canada.
  • Bernatsky S; McGill University Health Centre, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal, Canada sasha.bernatsky@mcgill.ca.
Lupus ; 24(8): 781-7, 2015 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25742688
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The overall cancer incidence risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is approximately 15%-20% more than in the general population. Nevertheless, to date, the optimal malignancy screening measures in SLE remain undefined. Our objective is to determine what investigations are needed to optimally monitor for malignancies in SLE in order to inform upcoming Canadian Rheumatology Association recommendations.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic search looking at three scientific sources, Embase, Medline and Cochrane, in an attempt to identify cancer screening recommendations for patients with SLE. We used a filter for observational studies and included articles published in 2000 and onward.

RESULTS:

The initial search strategy led to 986 records. After removal of duplicates and articles unrelated to SLE, we were left with 497 titles. From those, 79 research articles on cancer incidence in SLE were isolated and reviewed. Of the 79 original research papers, 25 offered screening recommendations, 14 suggested additional cancer screening whereas 11 studies simply promoted adherence to general population screening measures. The suggestions for more rigorous screening included recommending human papilloma virus testing in addition to routine cervical screening, and/or that cervical screening should be performed annually and/or suggested urine cancer screening in SLE patients with a history of cyclophosphamide exposure.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found no original research studies directly comparing cancer screening strategies in SLE. Generally, authors recommend adherence to general population screening measures, particularly cervical screening. This, possibly with adding targeted screening in special cases (e.g. annual urine cytology in patients with prior cyclophosphamide exposure, and considering existing lung cancer screening guidelines for past heavy smokers), may be a reasonable approach for cancer screening in SLE.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pulmonares / Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Lupus Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pulmonares / Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Lupus Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article