Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for extremely large prostatic adenoma in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Kim, Myong; Piao, Songzhe; Lee, Hahn-Ey; Kim, Sung Han; Oh, Seung-June.
Afiliação
  • Kim M; Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Piao S; Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee HE; Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim SH; Department of Urology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Oh SJ; Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Urol ; 56(3): 218-26, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25763126
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for extremely large prostates. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients undergoing HoLEP between July 2008 and December 2013 from the Seoul National University Hospital Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Database Registry were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to their total prostate volume (TPV) group A (TPV<100 mL), group B (100 mL≤TPV<200 mL), and group C (TPV≥200 mL); the clinical data of the three groups were compared. All patients were followed up 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS:

A total of 502 patients (group A, 426; group B, 70; group C, 6) with a mean age of 69.0 (standard deviation, ±7.3) years were included in our analysis. The mean prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen level were 68.7±36.9 mL and 4.15±4.24 ng/mL, respectively. The enucleation and morcellation times were longer in group C (p<0.001), and the enucleation efficacy was higher in this group (p<0.001, R(2)=0.399). Moreover, the mean postoperative catheterization and hospitalization periods were significantly longer in group C (p=0.004 and p=0.011, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in any other postoperative events, including recatheterization, reoperation, urinary tract infection, clot retention, and bladder neck contracture (p range, 0.516-0.913). One patient in group C experienced recurrence of the urethral stricture.

CONCLUSIONS:

HoLEP in patients with an extremely large prostate can be performed efficiently and safely.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Próstata / Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Terapia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Korean J Urol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Próstata / Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Terapia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Korean J Urol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article