Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multidisciplinary Intervention in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Brendbekken, Randi; Harris, Anette; Ursin, Holger; Eriksen, Hege R; Tangen, Tone.
Afiliação
  • Brendbekken R; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway. randi.brendbekken@sykehuset-innlandet.no.
  • Harris A; Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Ursin H; Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
  • Eriksen HR; Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Tangen T; Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
Int J Behav Med ; 23(1): 1-11, 2016 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25920707
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Musculoskeletal pain is associated with comorbidity, extensive use of health services, long-term disability and reduced quality of life. The scientific literature on effects of treatment for musculoskeletal pain is inconclusive.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study is to compare a multidisciplinary intervention (MI), including use of the novel Interdisciplinary Structured Interview with a Visual Educational Tool (ISIVET), with a brief intervention (BI), on effects on mental and physical symptoms, functioning ability, use of health services and coping in patients sick-listed due to musculoskeletal pain.

METHOD:

Two hundred eighty-four adults aged 18-60, referred to a specialist clinic in physical rehabilitation, were randomized to MI or BI. Patients received a medical examination at baseline and completed a comprehensive questionnaire at baseline, 3 months and 12 months.

RESULTS:

Both groups reported improvements in mental and physical symptoms, including pain, and improved functioning ability at 3 and 12 months, but the MI group improved faster than the BI group except from reports of pain, which had a similar course. Significant interactions between group and time were found on mental symptoms (anxiety (p < 0.05), depression (p < 0.01), somatization (p < 0.01)) and functioning ability (p < 0.01) due to stronger effects in the MI group at 3 months. At 3 and 12 months, the MI group reported significantly less use of health services (general practitioner (p < 0.05)). At 12 months, the MI group reported better self-evaluated capability of coping with complaints (p < 0.001) and they took better care of their own health (p < 0.001), compared to the BI group.

CONCLUSION:

The results indicate that the MI may represent an important supplement in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Qualidade de Vida / Adaptação Psicológica / Dor Musculoesquelética Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Behav Med Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Qualidade de Vida / Adaptação Psicológica / Dor Musculoesquelética Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Behav Med Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article