Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Water Exchange Is the Least Painful Colonoscope Insertion Technique and Increases Completion of Unsedated Colonoscopy.
Cadoni, Sergio; Falt, Premysl; Gallittu, Paolo; Liggi, Mauro; Mura, Donatella; Smajstrla, Vit; Erriu, Matteo; Leung, Felix W.
Afiliação
  • Cadoni S; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, St. Barbara Hospital, Iglesias (Carbonia-Iglesias), Italy. Electronic address: cadonisergio@gmail.com.
  • Falt P; Digestive Diseases Center, Vìtkovice Hospital, Záluzanského, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Gallittu P; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, St. Barbara Hospital, Iglesias (Carbonia-Iglesias), Italy.
  • Liggi M; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, St. Barbara Hospital, Iglesias (Carbonia-Iglesias), Italy.
  • Mura D; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, St. Barbara Hospital, Iglesias (Carbonia-Iglesias), Italy.
  • Smajstrla V; Digestive Diseases Center, Vìtkovice Hospital, Záluzanského, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Erriu M; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Italy.
  • Leung FW; Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, California; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 13(11): 1972-80.e1-3, 2015 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25956838
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Unsedated colonoscopy is acceptable for diagnostic, surveillance, and screening indications worldwide. However, insertion of the colonoscope can be painful; it is not clear which technique is least painful and thereby increases the likelihood of colonoscopy completion. We performed a head-to-head comparison of air insufflation (AI), carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, water immersion (WI), and water exchange (WE) to determine which combination of insertion techniques produces the least amount of pain.

METHODS:

In a patient-blinded prospective trial, 624 subjects were assigned randomly to groups that underwent colonoscopy with AI-AI, CO2-CO2, WI-AI, WE-AI, WI-CO2, or WE-CO2 insertion and withdrawal techniques, including on-demand sedation, at the St. Barbara Hospital (Iglesias, Italy) or the Vìtkovice Hospital (Ostrava, Czech Republic), from October 2013 through June 2014. The primary outcome was real-time maximum insertion pain (0 = none, 10 = worst), recorded by an unblinded nurse assistant. At discharge, a blinded observer recorded the recalled maximum insertion pain and patients' and investigators' guesses about method or gas used.

RESULTS:

Patients and investigators correctly guessed the method used for fewer than 44% of procedures, confirming adequate blinding. The correlation between real-time and recalled maximum insertion pain (r = 0.9; P < .0005) confirmed internal validation of the primary outcome. The WE group had the lowest scores mean pain values were 5.2 for AI-AI (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-5.8), 4.9 for CO2-CO2 (95% CI, 4.3-5.4), 4.3 for WI-CO2 (95% CI, 3.8-4.9), 4.0 for WI-AI (95% CI, 3.5-4.5), 3.1 for WE-CO2 (95% CI, 2.7-3.4), and 3.1 for WE-AI (95% CI, 2.7-3.6) (P < .0005). The highest proportions of patients completing unsedated colonoscopy were in the WE groups. WE groups also had significantly better colon cleanliness, particularly in the transverse and right colon (P < .0005). One limitation of the study was that colonoscopists and assistants were not blinded to water-aided insertion methods.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a prospective study of colonoscopy insertion methods, CO2 insufflation did not reduce real-time maximum insertion pain. Compared with AI or CO2, WI and WE reduced insertion pain. The least painful technique was WE, which significantly increased completion of unsedated colonoscopy and bowel cleanliness without prolonging insertion time. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01954862.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor / Colonoscopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Animals / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor / Colonoscopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Animals / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article