Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment Planning Comparison for Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Proton Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Spinal Sarcoma.
Matsumoto, Keiji; Nakamura, Katsumasa; Shioyama, Yoshiyuki; Sasaki, Tomonari; Ohga, Saiji; Yamaguchi, Toshihiro; Yoshitake, Tadamasa; Asai, Kaori; Kakiuchi, Genyu; Honda, Hiroshi.
Afiliação
  • Matsumoto K; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Nakamura K; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan nakam@radiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
  • Shioyama Y; Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA-HIMAT Foundation, Tosu, Japan.
  • Sasaki T; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Ohga S; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Yamaguchi T; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Yoshitake T; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Asai K; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Kakiuchi G; Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA-HIMAT Foundation, Tosu, Japan.
  • Honda H; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Anticancer Res ; 35(7): 4083-9, 2015 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26124359
BACKGROUND/AIM: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), proton therapy (PT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are new radiation modalities suitable for treatment of spinal sarcomas. The objective of the study was to compare the treatment planning of these modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a treatment planning comparison of the three modalities using a phantom imitating a spinal sarcoma and then six actual cases with spinal tumors. A uniform biological effective dose (BED) of 90 Gy10 was prescribed in previously reported fractionation schedules for each modality. The surface/center spinal cord dose constraints were set to BED of 96/77 Gy(E)3, respectively. RESULTS: CIRT achieved better homogeneity of dose distribution and coverage of target than PT independently of tumor extent around the spinal cord. In IMRT plans, the spinal cord dose was higher than that under CIRT and PT and coverage of the target deteriorated depending on the tumor extension. CONCLUSION: CIRT was most appropriate for the treatment of advanced spinal sarcomas.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcoma / Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Anticancer Res Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcoma / Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Anticancer Res Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article