Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health state utility values associated with advanced gastric, oesophageal, or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.
Carter, Gebra Cuyun; King, Denise T; Hess, Lisa M; Mitchell, Stephen A; Taipale, Kaisa-Leena; Kiiskinen, Urpo; Rajan, Narayan; Novick, Diego; Liepa, Astra M.
Afiliação
  • Carter GC; a Eli Lilly and Company , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
  • King DT; b Abacus International , Oxfordshire , UK.
  • Hess LM; a Eli Lilly and Company , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
  • Mitchell SA; b Abacus International , Oxfordshire , UK.
  • Taipale KL; c Eli Lilly and Company , Helsinki , Finland.
  • Kiiskinen U; c Eli Lilly and Company , Helsinki , Finland.
  • Rajan N; a Eli Lilly and Company , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
  • Novick D; d Eli Lilly and Company , Windlesham , UK.
  • Liepa AM; a Eli Lilly and Company , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
J Med Econ ; 18(11): 954-66, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212479
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To systematically identify utility values associated with advanced gastric cancer (GC), oesophageal cancer (OC), or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Utility values relating to health states are an essential component for cost-utility analysis (CUA).

METHODS:

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and EconLit databases were reviewed for relevant studies using a pre-defined search strategy. Studies eligible for inclusion reported health state utility values (HSUVs) using direct (standard gamble [SG] and time-trade-off [TTO]) and indirect (such as EuroQol 5D [EQ-5D], short-form 6D [SF-6D], and the 15-dimensional instrument [15D]) methods for patients with advanced GC, OC, or GEJ cancer.

RESULTS:

A total of 539 unique publications were identified, of which eight met the inclusion criteria (GC, n = 2; mixed population [gastrointestinal cancers], n = 4; OC, n = ). The most commonly used instrument to estimate HSUVs was the EQ-5D (n = 7). Utilities were also estimated using the SF-6D and the 15D in the same study (n = 1). Direct elicitation methods included the TTO (n = 2) and SG (n = 1). Across the eight identified publications, health states and study populations were heterogeneous and sample sizes were limited.

LIMITATIONS:

This review, as with all summaries of this nature, is only as robust as the data derived from the identified studies. The systematic review process does not resolve any design issues or biases associated with the original studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Limited data estimate HSUVs in patients with advanced GC, OC, or GEJ cancer. Utilities for advanced GC alone and advanced OC alone were reported in only two publications for each cancer type. No publications considered advanced GEJ utilities alone, and four publications considered utilities for a mixed population of gastrointestinal cancer types. Comparisons are confounded by heterogeneity across the identified publications. Further research into HSUVs associated with advanced GC and OC is required to improve the evidence available for use in CUAs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Nível de Saúde / Neoplasias Gastrointestinais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Econ Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Nível de Saúde / Neoplasias Gastrointestinais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Econ Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article