Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale.
Saib, Mahdi-Salim; Caudeville, Julien; Beauchamp, Maxime; Carré, Florence; Ganry, Olivier; Trugeon, Alain; Cicolella, Andre.
Afiliação
  • Saib MS; French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France. saib.mahdi.s@gmail.com.
  • Caudeville J; French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
  • Beauchamp M; French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
  • Carré F; French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
  • Ganry O; Epidemiology and public health department, University hospital of Amiens, Amiens, France.
  • Trugeon A; Regional Observatory of Health and Social Issues in Picardie, Amiens, France.
  • Cicolella A; French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique Alata,BP 2, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Environ Health ; 14: 68, 2015 Aug 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26294093
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Reducing health inequalities involves the identification and characterization of social and exposure factors and the way they accumulate in a given area. The areas of accumulation then allow for prioritization of interventions. The present study aims to build spatial composite indicators based on the aggregation of environmental, social and health indicators and their inter-relationships.

METHOD:

Preliminary work was carried out firstly to homogenize spatial coverage, and secondly to study spatial variation of environmental (EI), socioeconomic (SI) and health (HI) indicators. The aggregation of the different indicators was performed using several methodologies for which results and decision-makers' usability were compared.

RESULTS:

Four methodologies were tested 1) A simple summation of normalized HI, EI and SI indicators (IC), 2) the sum of the normalized HI, EI and SI indicators weighted by the first principal component of a Principal Component Analysis (IC PCA), 3) the sum of normalized and weighted indicators of the first principal component of Local Principal Component Analysis (IC LPCA), and 4) the sum of normalized and weighted indicators of the first principal component of a Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis (IC GWPCA).

CONCLUSION:

The GWPCA is particularly adapted to taking into account the spatial heterogeneity and the spatial autocorrelation between SI, EI and HI. This approach invalidates the basic assumptions of many standard statistical analyses. Where socioeconomic indicators present high deprivation and where they are associated with potential modifiable health determinants, decision-makers can prioritize these areas for reducing inequalities by controlling the socioeconomic and health determinants.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Ambiental / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Environ Health Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Ambiental / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Environ Health Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article