What we know, what we do not know, and where are we heading? Efficacy and acceptability of psychological interventions for depression.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci
; 25(4): 301-8, 2016 Aug.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26411324
ABSTRACT
In the past several decades, increasing evidence supports the efficacy of psychotherapies for depression. The vast majority of findings from meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and naturalistic studies have demonstrated that well-established psychotherapies (behavioural activation, problem-solving therapy, psychodynamic therapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy, interpersonal therapy and emotion-focused therapy) are superior to no-treatment and control conditions, and are in most cases equally effective in treating depression. However, despite this abundant support for psychotherapies, studies have also consistently shown high drop-out rates, high percentages of non-respondent patients who experience treatment failures, and mixed findings regarding the enduring effects of psychotherapy. Thus, there is a need to develop more personalised treatment models tailored to patients' needs. A new integrative sequential stepwise approach to the treatment of depression is suggested.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Psicoterapia
/
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental
/
Depressão
/
Transtorno Depressivo
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Prognostic_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci
Ano de publicação:
2016
Tipo de documento:
Article