[A comparative research on the treatment of ankle fracture with dislocation between emergency surgery and selective surgery].

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences between emergency surgery and selective surgery treatment of ankle fractures with dislocation. METHODS: In the study, 40 patients with ankle fracture and dislocation were treated and followed up from May 2013 to May 2014, and all the data were collected and analyzed. The subjects involved 29 male patients and 11 female patients. The patients were randomly separated into two groups, and the patients in group A were given surgical intervention within 6 hours after injury, while those in group B were initially given close reduction and given selective operation when the soft tissue condition got better. Group A contained 13 male patients and 7 female patients with average age of 37.10; Group B consisted of 15 male and 5 female, with average age of 37.85. RESULTS: The Baird-Jackson score was applied for assessment of the patients' outcomes. According to the score, the outcomes were classified into excellent, good, fair, and poor. In group A (emergency group), the outcomes were 13 (65.0%), 4 (20.0%), 3 (15.0%), and 0, respectively. In group B (selective group), they were 11 (55.0%), 7 (35.0%), 2 (10.0%), and 0, respectively. The numbers of the patients from excellent to poor were 24 (55.0%), 11 (27.5%), 5 (12.5%), and 0, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in postoperative function between the two groups, however, early surgical intervention can benefit in accomplishing anatomical reduction much easier and shortening the time of hospitalization, which is cost-saving for the patients.