Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Diagnostic imaging in dementia: use of imaging modalities in Dutch memory clinics]. / Beeldvormende diagnostiek bij dementie: inventarisatie van de praktijk binnen de Nederlandse geheugenklinieken.
Gardeniers, Mayke; Wattjes, Mike P; Meulen, Etienne F J; Barkhof, Frederik; Bakker, Jeannette.
Afiliação
  • Gardeniers M; AIOS radiologie, afdeling radiologie, Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, Nederland. m.gardeniers@asz.nl.
  • Wattjes MP; Radioloog, afdeling radiologie en nucleaire geneeskunde, VU medisch centrum, Amsterdam, Nederland.
  • Meulen EF; Klinisch geriater, afdeling geriatrie, Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, Nederland.
  • Barkhof F; Radioloog, afdeling radiologie en nucleaire geneeskunde, VU medisch centrum, Amsterdam, Nederland.
  • Bakker J; Radioloog, afdeling radiologie, Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, Nederland.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr ; 47(1): 2-8, 2016 Feb.
Article em Nl | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26525706
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the use of MRI and CT in the diagnostic work-up of dementia in Dutch memory clinics, and to analyse the rationale for choosing each modality. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A digital survey was sent by e-mail to all medical specialists (n=235) working at a memory clinic in the Netherlands.

RESULTS:

The survey was completed by 64% (151). 85% of the respondents were geriatricians, 13% neurologists and 2% other, working at a total of 69 clinics. 40% variably orders CT or MRI, 37% orders MRI, 19% CT, and 4% CT plus MRI. Primary factors influencing this choice are MRI contraindications, physical limitations, age, vascular or oncological medical history, and waiting time. With CT, 87% indicates information is lacking vascular disease/white matter lesions, (hippocampal) atrophy, and specific pathologies (metastases, amyloid angiopathy). Furthermore, respondents prefer MRI because they can assess the images more easily themselves. Only 50% of respondents indicate that CT protocol dictates coronal reconstructions. Additionally, these reconstructions are not provided consistently. Rating-scales are used to describe images in 5%. In 75% assessment is not uniform.

CONCLUSION:

MRI is preferred over CT in diagnostic imaging of dementia, in accordance with existing guidelines. However, these guidelines are mostly out-dated and modern multislice CT potential is relatively unknown among geriatricians. In memory clinics, multislice CT could offer a well suitable imaging alternative, but only if multiplanar reconstructions are performed consistently. Furthermore, radiology reports need to be improved by using more standardized assessment.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Demência / Geriatria Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Nl Revista: Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Demência / Geriatria Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Nl Revista: Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article