Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally Invasive Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis with Rectal Eversion Allows for Equivalent Outcomes in Continence in Pediatric Patients.
Huntington, Justin T; Boomer, Laura A; Pepper, Victoria K; Diefenbach, Karen A; Dotson, Jennifer L; Nwomeh, Benedict C.
Afiliação
  • Huntington JT; 1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio.
  • Boomer LA; 2 Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, Ohio.
  • Pepper VK; 1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio.
  • Diefenbach KA; 1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio.
  • Dotson JL; 1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio.
  • Nwomeh BC; 3 Department of Gastroenterology, Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 26(3): 222-5, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26565925
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Different techniques for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following total proctocolectomy (TPC) have been described in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), including rectal eversion (RE). RE allows for precise identification of the dentate line, but concerns have been raised regarding continence rates. No studies have specifically evaluated RE in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and continence rates for pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) TPC and IPAA with RE for UC. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

All patients who underwent TPC and IPAA were reviewed at our institution. Data collected included demographics, proctocolectomy technique (open without RE versus MIS with RE), operative time, postoperative data, and continence outcomes following ileostomy closure.

RESULTS:

Thirty-three patients were identified who underwent TPC and IPAA between July 2006 and October 2014. Thirty of these patients underwent ileostomy takedown and were evaluated for continence. Of these, 17 (56.7%) patients had a laparoscopic procedure, 5 (16.7%) had a robotic-assisted procedure, and 8 (26.7%) had an open procedure. There were no statistically significant differences in regard to demographics, operative time, or length of stay when comparing the two groups. There were no differences in the two groups as measured at 1, 6, and 12 months in terms of number of daily stools (P = .93, .09, and .87, respectively), nighttime stooling (P = .29, .10, and .25, respectively), soiling (P = .43, .36, and .52, respectively), or stool-altering medication usage (P = .26, 1.00, and .37, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

The RE technique can be used safely and effectively during MIS TPC and IPAA in children without altering continence rates.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Reto / Colite Ulcerativa / Proctocolectomia Restauradora / Laparoscopia / Incontinência Fecal / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Reto / Colite Ulcerativa / Proctocolectomia Restauradora / Laparoscopia / Incontinência Fecal / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article