Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transanal Local Excision for Patients With Rectal Cancer: Can Radiation Compensate for What Is Perceived as a Nondefinitive Surgical Approach?
Rackley, Thomas P; Ma, Roy M K; Brown, Carl J; Hay, John H.
Afiliação
  • Rackley TP; 1 BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 2 Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 3 Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 59(3): 173-8, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26855390
BACKGROUND: Total mesorectal excision has long been the standard of care for patients with rectal cancer. However, in select patients, local excision is an appropriate alternative option. The role of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients treated with local excision is controversial and evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report oncological outcomes of patients with rectal cancer treated with local excision and adjuvant radiation. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective chart review. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the BC Cancer Agency, a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 93 patients with node-negative rectal cancer treated with local excision and adjuvant radiotherapy between 2001 and 2010 were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and tumor characteristics are reported. Five-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Five-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival for patients treated with local excision and adjuvant radiotherapy were 78.5%, 86.1%, and 83.8%. In T1 disease, local control was 92.5%. LIMITATIONS: Referral bias, selection bias, lack of uniform surveillance, and retrospective analysis are the study limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Local excision with adjuvant radiotherapy provides a good level of local control in T1 disease and remains a good treatment option for patients who are either medically not suitable for a more radical surgical approach or who refuse this procedure. Local excision and radiotherapy should not be advocated in T2/T3 disease; however, it can provide a good alternative in those patients who are not fit enough for a more radical operation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Adenocarcinoma / Colectomia / Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Dis Colon Rectum Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Adenocarcinoma / Colectomia / Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Dis Colon Rectum Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article